User talk:Eowbotm1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user talk page has been protected from editing to prevent Eowbotm1 (talkcontribsblock log) from introducing vandalism to it, posting abuse and nonsense or using the {{unblock}} template after the denial of a previous request . If you have come here to issue a new warning to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here. (protection log).

Ok...if anyone has anything to say, please be concise, to the point, and avoid ad hominem attacks, or other logical fallacies. Thanks.Eowbotm1 22:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

Gibberish

Just letting you know that I caught you adding nonsense in this edit of English language. If you want to avoid having this account permanently blocked as well, I suggest you refrain from further acts of vandalism. Thankyou. --Imroy 18:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Unblock

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:

Autoblock of 68.227.209.93 lifted. Sorry for the trouble.

Request handled by: Luna Santin 01:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Removing warnings from your own talk page

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 20:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Removing warnings from other talk pages

Please do not target one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 20:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked as a reincarnation of indefinitely blocked user Eowbotm (talkcontribs[logs]block user[block log]). If you wish to appeal this block please do so from your main account. Guy (Help!) 13:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "What the hell? reincarnation of eowbotm? that username was taken when I got here. What exactly have I done to merit a block? And this is my main account. I haven't ever really vandalized. Please explain."


Decline reason: "You haven't "really" vandalized? It's apparent that you're only here to be disruptive. Not only do you share a username prefix, but the same editing patterns. This is enough justification for the blocking of all your accounts on sight. --  Netsnipe   ►  02:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

What do you mean, same editing patterns? I looked at eowbotm, and he seems to have been blocked after like 6 pure vandalism. I have only made legit edits (the "really" was because a few of them were biased). And, again, I am not affiliated with him in any way. Perhaps you could look at more "evidence" than a site which says "people may want to review eowbotm1, but the others..." I don't understand why I have been blocked for the actions of someone else who so happens to have a similar username as mine. I don't know where he got it from, but its the name I've used in several of my online usernames: a joke from an online comic I like to read. Perhaps he got it from the same thing. In conclusion, don't punish me for the actions of another.Eowbotm1 02:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

You were previously autoblocked for sharing the same IP address as Freemoneyplz (talk contribs). Considering that both this account and you have tried to vandalise English language by inappropriately inserting "gibberish" here and here you are definitely up to no good. So good bye. --  Netsnipe  ►  06:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)