Talk:ENom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This latest edit looks rather like it's a copy-paste from eNom's site or similar - certainly seems rather too commercial for Wikipedia, anyway. Any objections to reverting to the previous edit, or similar?
– orudge 00:45, 01 January 2006 (UTC)
It doesn't look like that to me, in fact I would say the article is highly biased against ENOM, the information is not encyclopedic, more of a rant. --Jackaranga 14:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I added POV, I am fairly new to wikipedia and can't decide whether the kind of comment about unavailable customer support, is useful information. --Jackaranga 21:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)