User talk:Engjs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jim Smith, as far as I can tell, you are engjs, 125.255.16.233, and 134.148.20.33. You have reverted the Brignell article five times in the past 24 hours. This violates Wikipedia's Three-revert rule and can led to your being banned for 24 hours. --TimLambert 12:52, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

Hello, I saw the request you made on the Mediation Cabal and i'm interested on helping, but I haven't seen any message from you telling the other party about this. Should I send it so we can begin? For you are baned, you might send me an email to imaglangATyahooDOTcom--Neigel von Teighen 15:47, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Ups, sorry: I didn't notice JQ responded in the mediation request page! So I have contacted him. Anyway, if you need me you have my email address or you can use my talk page if you need to contact me. --Neigel von Teighen 15:51, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RFC was closed

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jeffrey Vernon Merkey was closed on March 5, so voting on it has little meaning. As the RFC was considered flawed by most editors, a straw poll was conducted on the talk page of Jeffrey Merkey Vernon (now archived) which came to a different conclusion. Also note that Jeff Merkey (User:Waya sahoni/User:Gadugi) has started an RFAr on rougly the same subject, and that request is still pending in the acceptance phase. --MJ^(☎|@|C) 15:48, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Let's see if this works

"TELL THE WIKITRUTH"

If you see this, you might like to look over the article on John Brignell as an example of abuse in wikipedia. The talk page pretty much sums up what has happened, or you can email me and I'll provide you with a summary. My email is engjsATccDOTnewcastleDOTeduDOTau. It's an example of how fanatics misuse the wikipedia system to discredit opponents holding opposing viewpoints. Engjs 14:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)