Talk:Engagement on Lake Huron

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Engagement on Lake Huron is part of WikiProject Lakes, a WikiProject which aims to systematically improve lake-related articles using the tools on the Project page. You are welcome and encouraged to edit the article attached to this page and to join the project.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

An entry from Engagement on Lake Huron appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 27 March 2006.

I'm thinking about removing the stubs. This is great for an article on creation, more so for a single battle. Good stuff. TKE 05:32, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

I took out the stubs. Salient details, good sources, not much else to expand it that wouldn't be an exercise in prose. Good stuff. TKE 07:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Great article Andreas 11:06, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] pov

this page is pov against the americans as it only talk about the british victories. i demand an AMERICAN edit this page

Hey, I'm an American. The article is presented from the POV of the British, I agree. However, the description of the battle itself and the outcome are factually correct and NPOV. The overall tone of the article, not the writing, is NPOV insofar as it does not endorse the British and that at the time of the war the British were crushing the Americans in the Northern Campaigns. The reading of the article is most likely to come off of a link and flows nicely with following the links to narrate the War of 1812. If you can tweak it without interrupting the rhythm, by all means do. It's a tough challenge, because it's a good write up and those are hard to copy edit. TKE 03:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)