User talk:EndlessVince
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You blanked most of the article, you can remove irrelevent trivia without doing that. - Deathrocker 10:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
I need the rights to change Brandi Carlile's wikipedia page. I am employeed by her management team and they want her page looking good by Monday, this includes allowing me to modify each section and upload a new photograph. - Spence2383 12:40, 30 March 2007
Contents |
[edit] Wikiproject
Hi, I noticed you signed up as a contributor to the Indie Music Wikiproject. However, it has been inactive for over a year and it has since been replaced by Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to contribute you can list yourself as a participant. WesleyDodds 23:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Animorphs
Since the disclosure of Jake's last name is a spoiler, should it be made a soft redirect such as Darth Sidious's page?--Lkjhgfdsa 22:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- A soft redirect from Jake (Animorphs)? Yeah, I think that's a great idea, seeing as how most of the article is spoiler anyway. --EndlessVince 01:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] About Floater
I was thinking about removing the page for their discography, and instead putting the album names and years on their main page, and giving each album its own article.
Seems to make more sense to me, rather than having one big article for the entire discography.
Please leave me some input. Bearingbreaker92 23:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- I did kind of what they did for Nirvana's discography. Granted, it's not as polished, but that's kind of what I was thinking. The point was just to cut the information from Floater's article that didn't really belong here (i.e. Track listings). If you feel doing it your way will work out better, you have my blessing. I just don't want to see dead links for albums, or track lists on the main article. --EndlessVince 01:02, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deathrocker
It is highly debatable if that band play that style of music (compare them to any of the other bands in the genre, they have nothing to do with them or their style).. it needs to be emphasised that they are not somehow part of that scene or even accepted amongst it, rather they are among the metalcore, post hardcore and other Warped Tour affilated bands and fan bases. Also some anon keeps vandalising the article changing their genre to things that don't exist, not sure why. - Deathrocker 02:51, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
There is no rule as to how an editor keeps their talkpage, read the policy. It says "some choose to delete". I archive the interesting/useful ones I may need at a later date and delete the rest once read. - Deathrocker 08:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 7-Year Bitch
The short of it: no, plenty of the early 90s punk scene in Seattle had little or nothing to do with grunge. It was a very diverse musical scene, even if you stay more or less within the punk-influenced. The Fastbacks were pop-punk, The Squirrels even poppier but with undeniable punk influences; Gas Huffer's punk had a strong influence from rockabilly; The Fartz were just plain hardcore. There were probably 75-100 good working bands with punk influences, and another 75-100 other first-rate bands in town (among the notable non-punks were Presidents of the United States of America, Sir Mix-a-Lot, Amy Denio, Skerik, Sky Cries Mary). The Gits and 7 Year Bitch were definitely punk, but they weren't grunge. At the time, no one who was into "classifying" bands called 7 Year Bitch "grunge": they had to fend off the riot grrl label, a scene they respected but did not feel part of.
7 Year Bitch owe more musically to The Gits than to anyone else, and although The Gits were based in Seattle, they were basically a transplanted Ohio band.
I have much basis to know what I'm talking about; I'm willing to explain by email, but not to post publicly. You apparently don't accept Wikipedia email, but feel free to email me and I will write back. -- Jmabel | Talk 04:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Smoosh
You added the "original research" tag to Smoosh. I've gotten rid of the few statements I think were at all dubious, and cited for almost (but not quite) everything in the article. Do you think it still needs the tag? - Jmabel | Talk 06:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Rock music invitation
Hello WikiProject Alternative music member.
WikiProject Alternative music, in my eyes, has proved to be successful "improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock", and improving their quality as well. One specific example I have witnessed is The Smashing Pumpkins article. The page has gone from a mediocre work, to GA status, to FA nomination. Only appropriate, as the Pumpkins are undeniably one of the most influential alternative rock bands on the 1990's and beyond.
This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently ressurected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and not only be a member of alternative Wikipedians, but the rockin' ones as well.
Rock on.
--Reaper X 03:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
