User talk:Emiellaiendiay
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to the talk page of Emiellaiendiay. You can view old comments by going to Archive 1.
|
Archive 1 User: Emiellaiendiay |
[edit] JAC
Hehe, same grade. I'll have to challenge you again sometime... Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 18:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed. — Emiellaiendiay 19:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fucking Åmal
I'm looking thorugh it at the moment and will let you know as soon as I've translated the Swedish one. Will look through the actress' articles too and see what I can do to them. Thanks for letting me know about themIntesvensk 16:35, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RE: WP Africa Invitation
Thanks for the invitation Emiellaiendiay. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 09:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome and thanks for all you are doing on Wikipedia
I see nobody has officially welcomed you; so that would be me. Your level of energy and creativity is herewith acknowledged. It is refreshing to see someone put so much positive effort forward, since Wikipedia is rife with people who complain and criticise, without producing much in the way of real additions. I have a few queries regarding your newly created and excellent idea for "Jumpaclass"
- I don't see how you are doing the accounting, for example, if one creates a new article and takes it to "start class". Does that create twice the point count as just moving a "stub" to "start"?
- What does "head to head" mean?
- Is it allowed to help out on another article that has been listed by another editor?"
(please respond here to keep the thread intact, as i am watching this page for now.) Anlace 23:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome and acknowledgement. Before I say anything else, I must rightly acknowledge Dev920 for the invention of Jumpaclass. I've only tried to get the concept started on other WikiProjects. (It orginated on WP:LGBT, as can be viewed here.) It's been quite effective in that project, so I thought it could be brought over to WP:BAY.
I'll now address your questions:
- Besides wondering about how it would work, I haven't really considered the creation of a new article. As of now the project only considers taking a stub, start, or B-class article to a higher class. If it is to include creating articles from scratch, I'd add on an extra point for taking an article from nonexistence to stub status. So instead of two, it'd be three points.
- Head-to-head is when an editor challenges another editor to compete in Jumpaclass. They each pick an article on the same day. Each attempts to bring his or her article to a higher class than the other, within a week. The final class of the article is judged a different editor than either of the two participating in head-to-head.
- I suppose it is impossible to avoid having other editors work on an article at the same time, but the contributions of only the editor participating in Jumpaclass should be considered in terms of getting points. This does bring up an interesting idea: joint collaboration, which I think I might add as an option.
Check out the LGBT Jumpaclass to see how Jumpaclass works when more it's active than SFBA's currently is.
You've brought up a lot of good points, so I'll make some changes to Jumpaclass right now.
— Emiellaiendiay 23:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
P.S. Thanks for participating in it!
- Thanks for your quick clarifications. The LGBT Jumpaclass does look good, being so active. Hopefully we can stimulate a similar level of fervour. One more question/suggestion. We should make sure we have a mechanism for early review if an editor requests to allow for a shot at DYK, since DYK has only a five day window for acceptance. The stub tag needs to be removed for proper nomination to DYK. As above please respond here. Anlace 01:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Apologies, but I'm not very familiar with DYK. Would you please explain how it works, so that I better understand your question? Also, are you referring to the project tag with the stub class listed, or to the stub tags placed on the article page? Thanks, — Emiellaiendiay 01:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- DYK stands for "Did you know?". These are articles selected by administrators to appear in summary form on the main page of wikipedia. To qualify an article must be either new or newly evolved from stub to higher class. The key timing element is that it is not eligible for DYK if it is over 5 days old. Thus if we wait a full 7 days to review the newly graduated articles, they wouldnt make the deadline. It would be nice to have all the hard work of the SF bay area group be acknowledged on the main page. i see the possible solutions as follows:
-
- 1. An editor could request early review by placing a tag beside her (or his) nom such as "(Review now)"
- 2. An editor could request early review by placing a tag saying "(needs early review for DYK)". In this case the article should be scheduled for a more thorough review at your seven day mark, in case the article improves further. And at least the stub tag could be removed at the early point to allow DYK candidacy. Anlace 03:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for the explanation. I've added the option of "speedy review" to the list. Do you think that takes care of the issue? — Emiellaiendiay 03:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Yes, thanks for the responsive change. That should solve it. One (hopefully) final point. I would quibble that going from scratch to "start" class should be worth two points. Cheers. Anlace 04:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Yeah, I thought about it (especially considering I wrote the history of Piedmont, California article from scratch), but what made me make it the same as "from stub" is that it's very easy to create a stub; it could take but two minutes. In that way stubs are hardly different from starting from nothing. If you can think of any way to address this issue, I'd be happy to change the points value. — Emiellaiendiay 07:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Your point is a good one and i think the complexity involved of defining a "short stub" is not worth sacrificing the simplicity of use of the existing system. So you've convinced me. :) Regards. Anlace 14:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
Farming out my ideas to other projects - I'm so proud! And is it me, or does the collaboration and project template look strangely familiar on WP:BAY? :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jumpaclass
Thanks for the invitation! I'm afraid though that I'm more of a nuts-and-bolts person making small changes to articles. If you look here: Wikipedia:WikiGnome you will find a picture of me. :-) Schmiteye 01:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- All right; that's fine. But if you ever feel like contributing to an article beyond Gnome-edits, you know where Jumpaclass is! P.S. Thanks for teaching me a new Wiki-term. — Emiellaiendiay 01:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Importance assessments on Proj SF bay area
Thanks for all the work you ve put into this project E. Is the assessment format set up to accept "importance" ratings? I tried a couple and they didnt seem to work the same way project California works. Is there a format one needs to use? Please respond here to keep the thread intact. Best regards. Anlace 03:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- No, it's not set up for rating by importance, only by class. Unfortunately, I'm not savvy enough to change that, but if you know how, you're welcome to add the importance option. — Emiellaiendiay 03:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- well ive spent an hour rewriting the source code and got it programmed to accept "importance" levels, but the display got fouled up, so ive reverted the template to its old version before i started my efforts. perhaps we could ask for help from the programmer who did the project california page. Anlace 05:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Lesbian novels
Hi, thanks for creating this category, it's something I felt was missing before. I have every intention of helping to fill it up and adding bisexual/gay/trans versions. I was just wondering about the name though. Do you think we might run into trouble with what exactly constitutes a "lesbian novel"? ie is it any novel by a lesbian author, one dominated by lesbian themes, main character lesbian, featuring minor lesbian characters / subplots? Maybe it should be something more along the lines of the "LGBT-related films" category. What do you think? Belovedfreak 17:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I think "lesbian-themed novels" sounds better. Earlier I placed it into Category:Novels. Do you think it's ok there or should it be in Category:Novels by genre or something? Thanks Belovedfreak 18:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa
Well, while adding the above messages, I noticed a mention of the Africa Project and got seriously sidetracked. I've tagged some Cameroonian musicians with the AfricaProject tag, and I think I'll now go and add my name to the project! Belovedfreak 18:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jumpaclass
i thought you would challenge me today on a "head-to-head"..... :) Anlace 04:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Great, i accept your gauntlet. i assume we are dealing with the two articles we each posted on feb 26th? as far as reviewing your article, i shall provide a skeletal review on the article talk page as a guide to help another editor finish the review. since i am a regular competitor, i think i shouldnt be a regular reviewer. what are your thoughts on this? it seems like we need to recruit some reviewers to help us with the review cycle part of Jumpaclass. In any case you have done a super job on the piedmont middle school, and if no one steps forward within a few days i shall finalise the review at your choice. how does that all sound? best. Anlace
-
- Havens is looking great Em. Regarding Piedmont, do you wish me to complete the review? I started the re-rating on the Piedmont talk page and was hoping someone not involved in the competition could help us with reviewing. but if no one steps forward, your article needs a re-review ASAP. let me know what you think. best regards. Anlace 18:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- It would be great if you could reassess Piedmont Middle School. I'll try to get someone else involved in the reviewing aspect of JAC, but until then it's up to us to do it, excluding reviewing our own articles. — Emiellaiendiay 00:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- done. Anlace 17:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- congrats on your outcome of the great article on Havens; one rarely sees an article on a school of this quality. i guess our competition resulted in a tie...:) User:Quarls was good to step up and do reviews for the articles. we shall have to compete again (for a tiebreaker) after i recover from my surgery of yesterday. i have updated the February page as much as i could. I have added the points for Havens and Tolay to the point counter, but i didnt know how you wanted to file away completed "head to head" so i leave that bit to you. best regards. Anlace 17:08, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] Fucking Åmal (again)
Hi there. I have posted a translation of the Swedish article on the English article's talk page. See what you think. Take care. Intesvensk
[edit] WatchlistBot
I'll add WikiProject Africa to my to do list, and let you know if I have any questions, or when I get it done. Ingrid 00:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- I started tagging categories for you, and created the watchlist. I was tagging Arab/Arabic categories because I was thinking Saudi Arabia was part of Africa (geography is not my strong suit). So, I realize my geography error, but I also think there are a fair number of Arabs in Africa. So, please let me know if the project wants to include all Arab/Arabic categories, none, or wants me to generate a list so you can choose. Ingrid 19:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Films February Newsletter
The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 22:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] LGBT WikiProject newsletter
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[edit] Thanks!
Thank you for your tremendous help on our school's wiki! (Skyline)
I hope to add more to the article, but find that it is very difficult to cite any websites because, quite frankly, I would not expect anyone writing about a high school in Oakland.
However, there is a ton of primary and secondary resources that are not on the web: yearbooks, anecdotes by teachers who have known the school since its inception, and especially word-of-mouth information that is agreed upon by a consensus around here.
Is it even possible to put that on Wikipedia? Lots of great info, just not on the web. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kleinheero (talk • contribs) 23:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC).
Klein Lieu 23:48, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Johann Hari
Hi there - please do stay engaged with the Johann Hari discussion, this guy felix-Felix is clearly trying to twist the entry to attack Hari and I could do with all the support I can get! Feel free to join the mediation discussion, it'd be much appreciated... David r from meth productions 11:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jumpaclass
Do you intend to apply for GA for Intersexuality? Otherwise I can't really do anything with the article. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 15:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's an ad hoc thing at the moment, i.e. no-one does it because they think everyone else will. That's why they made me coordinator. :) I try and keep on top of it but sometimes I forget and stuff gets overrun. I needs to get me a daily checklist. You're welcome to assess other people's jumpaclass, should you wish to. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Afro-Asian
Thanks for cleaning up my typos. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 13:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- No problem.— Emiellaiendiay 15:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - March 2007
The March 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Academy (Berkeley, California)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article The Academy (Berkeley, California), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 21:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] March WP:FILMS Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 00:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
[edit] LGBT WikiProject newsletter
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SatyrBot 05:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - April 2007
The April 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by Grafikbot 11:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)