Embodied energy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Portal:Energy
 Energy Portal

Embodied Energy refers to the quantity of energy required to manufacture, and supply to the point of use, a product, material or service.

Traditionally considered, embodied energy is an accounting methodology which aims to find the sum total of the energy necessary - from the raw material extraction, to transport, manufacturing, assembly, installation as well as the capital and other costs of a specific material - to produce a service or product and finally its disassembly, deconstruction and/or decompostion. Different methodologies produce different understandings of the scale and scope of application and the type of energy embodied. Some methodologies are interested in accounting for the energy embodied in terms of oil that support economic processes. Other types of methodologies are concerned to account for the energy embodied in terms of sunlight that support ecological processes. And others like systems ecology are concerned about the support of the ecological-economic process as a whole. Embodied energy as a concept used in systems ecology seeks to measure the "true" energy cost of an item, and has extended this to the concept of "true" value. Methodologies such as emergy have also sought to link embodied energy with fundamental concepts, such as capacitance for example, in physical, electronic and chemical sciences.

Contents

[edit] Embodied energy methodologies

Different methodologies use different scales of data to calculate energy embodied in products and services of nature and human civilization. International consensus on the appropriateness of data scales and methodologies is pending. This difficulty can give a wide range in embodied energy values for any given material. In the absence of a comprehensive global embodied energy public dynamic database, embodied energy calculations may omit important data on, for example, the rural road/highway construction and maintenance needed to move a product, human marketing, advertising, catering services, non-human services and the like. Such omissions can be a source of significant methodological error in embodied energy estimations (Lenzen 2001). Without an estimation and declaration of the embodied energy error, it is difficult to calibrate the sustainability index, and so the value of any given material, process or service to environmental and human economic processes.

[edit] Classification of embodied energy methodologies

There appear to be three main differences in contemporary embodied energy methodologies. Following Tennenbaum (1988) these may be identified as ‘anthropocentric’ and ‘capitalcentric’, with a third identified as ‘ecocentric’. According to Tennenbaum, the difference in methodologies is determined by how they treat, and where they attribute energy depreciation in a network of ecological system energy flows. In all the methods, depreciation is taken away from the production process under consideration and reassigned elsewhere in the total system. What characterises a method is where they assign this energetic loss. According to David M. Scienceman (1987), the principle point of difference is whether embodied energy is partitioned at work intersections and apportioned among pathways.

[edit] Anthropocentric embodied energy analysis

Anthropocentric embodied energy analysis is interested in what energy goes to supporting a consumer, and so all energy depreciation is assigned to the final demand of consumer but not to storages of ‘assets’ or ‘capital stocks’. It is associated with Hannon’s work. There is no requirement that energy must be expressed as one energy form or quality.

[edit] Capitalcentric embodied energy analysis

Capitalcentric embodied energy analysis is interested to know what supports assets, energy depreciation is therefore assigned to storages of ‘assets’ or ‘capital stocks’, but not to final demand. This method is associated with Herendeen's and Costanza's works, where embodied energy is apportioned among pathways and partitioned at work intersections, and is therefore additive just like first law heat energy. As with the anthropocentric view, there is no requirement that energy must be expressed as one energy form or quality.

[edit] Ecocentric embodied energy analysis: Emergy

In ecocentric embodied energy analysis, depreciation is assigned to a unit of production, that is, assigned to both storages of ‘assets’ or ‘capital stocks’, and to final demand. This method is associated with Howard T. Odum's works, where embodied energy is not apportioned among pathways and is therefore not additive just like first law heat energy. Energy is only partitioned at work intersections that are diverging, flexible and high-quality energies that feed back (1994, p. 264). Odum's interpretation was informed by similar notions of feed back as used in electronic circuits.

"Energy used in developing energy of higher quality is 'embodied energy'" (H.T.Odum 1994, p. 251).

Dr. D.M.Scienceman coined the term 'emergy' to make this method dinstinct from the above two types of analysis: "The prefix em- can, fortuitously, even be taken to indicate an energy memory property, a record of source energy transformed." In the emergy methodology there is a requirement that energy must be expressed in one energy form or quality. Non-emergy approaches most often evaluate only nonrenewable resources, depending on what human technologies are able to extract from them (user-side quality). The Energy Systems Language is used to help make emergy algorithms transparent.

[edit] Historical perspective of calculation methods

The history of constructing a system of accounts which records the energy flows through our environment can be traced back to the origins of accounting itself. As a distinct method, it is often associated with the physiocrat's "substance" theory of value (Mirowski 1999, pp. 154-163), and later the agricultural energetics of Serhii Podolinsky, a Ukrainian socialist physician (Martinez-Alier 1990), and the ecological energetics of V.V.Stanchenskii (Weiner 2000, pp. 70-71, 78-82). However, the main methods of embodied energy accounting as they are used today grew out of Wassily Leontief's input-output model and are called Input-Output Embodied Energy analysis. Leontief's input-output model was in turn an adaptation of the neo-classical theory of general equilibrium with application to, "the empirical study of the quantitative interdependence between interrelated economic activities" (Leontief 1966, p. 134). According to Tennenbaum (1998), Leontief's Input-Output method was adapted to embodied energy analysis by Hannon (1973) to describe ecosystem energy flows. Hannon’s adaptation tabulated the total direct and indirect energy requirements (the ‘energy intensity’) for each output made by the system. The total amount of energies, direct and indirect, for the entire amount of production was called the ‘embodied energy’.

[edit] References

  • D.H.Clark, G.J.Treloar and R.Blair (2003) 'Estimating the increasing cost of commercial buildings in Australia due to greenhouse emissions trading, in J.Yang, P.S.Brandon and A.C.Sidwell, Proceedings of The CIB 2003 International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Brisbane, Australia.
  • R.Costanza (1979) "Embodied Energy Basis for Economic-Ecologic Systems." PhD Dissertation. Gainesville, FL: Univ. of FL. 254 pp. (CFW-79-02)
  • B.Hannon (1973) "The Structure of ecosystems", Journal of Theoretical Biology, 41, pp. 535-546.
  • M.Lenzen (2001) "Errors in conventional and input-output-based life-cycle inventories", "Journal of Industrial Ecology", 4(4), pp. 127-148.
  • M.Lenzen and G.J.Treloar (2002) 'Embodied energy in buildings: wood versus concrete-reply to Börjesson and Gustavsson, Energy Policy, Vol 30, pp. 249-244.
  • W.Leontief (1966) Input-Output Economics, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • J. Martinez-Alier (1990) Ecological Economics: Energy Environment and Society, Basil Blackwell Ltd, Oxford.
  • P.Mirowski (1999) More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature's Economics, Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • H.T.Odum (1994) Ecological and General Systems: An Introduction to Systems Ecology, Colorado University Press, Boulder Colorado.
  • D.M.Scienceman (1987) Energy and Emergy. In G. Pillet and T. Murota (eds), Environmental Economics: The Analysis of a Major Interface. Geneva: R. Leimgruber. pp. 257-276. (CFW-86-26)
  • S.E.Tennenbaum (1988) Network Energy Expenditures for Subsystem Production, MS Thesis. Gainesville, FL: University of FL, 131 pp. (CFW-88-08)
  • G.J.Treloar (1997) Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input-Output Tables: Towards an Input-Output-based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method, Economic Systems Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 375- 391.
  • G.J.Treloar (1998) A comprehensive embodied energy analysis framework, Ph. D. thesis, Deakin University, Australia.
  • G.J.Treloar, C.Owen and R.Fay (2001) 'Environmental assessment of rammed earth construction systems', Structural survey, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 99-105.
  • G.J.Treloar, P.E.D.Love, G.D.Holt (2001) Using national input-output data for embodied energy analysis of individual residential buildings, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 49-61.
  • D.R.Weiner (2000) Models of Nature: Ecology, Conservation and Cultural Revolution in Soviet Russia, University of Pittsburgh Press, United States of America.
  • G.P.Hammond and C.I.Jones (2005) Inventory of (Embodied) Carbon & Energy (ICE), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, United Kingdom

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../e/m/b/Embodied_energy.html"
In other languages