User talk:Emax
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This user is inactive since 10:59, 18 February 2005.
This user is also not replying to emails. If you have any questions about this user, you might find help at Wikipedia talk:Polish Wikipedians' notice board. We also help with finding sources and licenses for the images! |
[edit] Emax - twoje wykazy polskich herbow i grafika herbowa sa plagiatem
- Grafika herbowa jest autorstwa Pana Tadeusza Gajla ("Herby szlacheckie Rzeczypospolitej Obojga Narodow", Gdansk, 2003).
- Wykazy herbownych zaczerpnięte z "Genealogia dynastyczna" (Ryszard Jurzak).
Żądamy natychmiastowego wyjaśnienia sprawy.
[edit] Dajemy ci szanse - zwroc sie z tym do autorow
[edit] Template:Polishcity
Zerknij, proszę, na Template talk:Polishcity. Myślę, że zamiast walczyć ciągle z Gz., możnaby się z nim jakoś dogadać i znaleźć jakieś modo vivendi. Halibutt 07:32, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] comments
Comments go on talk pages, not on user pages. This also applies to anon pages. You should know that. Comment on anon page removed. -- Chris 73 Talk 10:45, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
- You can add comments, but please do not change other peoples comments. That would be vandalism. -- Chris 73 Talk 00:44, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Jan Nowak-Jeziorański
Czołem! Czy masz gdzieś w swoich archiwach zdjęcie PD do artykułu Jan Nowak-Jezioranski? Halibutt 12:47, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Opis rv
Dobrze by bylo gdybys opisywal w Talku kazdego rv - zwlasza przy naszych drazliwych sasiadach z N i R. Wytrąciłoby to im z ręki argument przeciw nam :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 14:02, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Antypolonizm
Hmmmm.... nie do końca rozumiem o co Ci z tą kategorią chodziło. Samo zjawisko antypolonizmu nie jest dla mnie do końca jasne, a już zupełnie nie rozumiem co łączy sowieckie łagry z rzezią Pragi i George'm W Bushem. Myślę, że dobrze by było napisać najpierw artykuł o zjawisku, a dopiero później podciągać pod niego kategorię. Zwłaszcza że póki co pachnie mi to ostrym POVem... Halibutt 22:45, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Nie zrozumieliśmy się. Ja antypolonizm rozumiem jako chorobliwą, nieumotywowaną niechęć do Polaków. Taka definicja nie obejmuje - moim zdaniem - zachowań psychopatycznych, a już kompletnie nie ma przełożenia na politykę. Poza tym ciężko nazwać masowe morderstwo czy czystkę etniczną przejawem niechęci. Chociaż z drugiej strony skoro można tak klasyfikować Category:Anti-Semitism... Halibutt 23:00, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
Dzieki za pomoc przy blitzie, a co do apolonizmu, to chyba Halibutt zaproponowal salomonowe rozwiazanie - mieć ciastko i zjeść ciastko :) Dobre, nie sądzisz? Chodzi mi o 'idea' z Talk:Anti-polonism oczywisciie. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:57, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Uważam, że przesadziłeś z Balcerem. Fakt, w wielu miejscach nie miał najlepszych pomysłów, ale osobiste ataki są niesprawiedliwe. Proszę, zastanów się na przyszłość nad twoim postępowaniem - nie chcesz chyba być uważany za polski odpowiednik Gzorneplatza? Powinniśmy się pozytwnie odróżniać od takiego nacjonalistycznego chamstwa. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:10, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Witaj
Jest pewna nieścisłość z publikacją wizerunków polskich monet i banknotów aktualnie w obiegu.
http://www.nbp.pl/home.aspx?f=disclaimer_banknoty.htm
Czy pytałeś NBP omożliwość publikacji?
Niki K 11:24, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Witaj
Jest pewna nieścisłość z publikacją wizerunków polskich monet i banknotów aktualnie w obiegu.
Zasady wykorzystywania wizerunków polskich banknotów i monet
Czy pytałeś NBP omożliwość publikacji?
Niki K 11:25, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] your general comments
Hi. Could I ask you two things? (1) Please write comments on article talk pages in english. I know it is a foreign language for you, but these talk pages are supposed to be understood by all contributors to the english wiki. On user talk pages you can use any language you wish, but on public talk pages please stick to english. (2) I think it would be good if you could tone down your comments. Constant degrading references to Deutschtum, Obersturmführer, Pickelhaube, etc. are not helpful in any discussion (as you may have noticed in recent conversations with me on an anons talk page - for which i apologized). (BTW, your english seems to be pretty good in ridiculing people) Now, pretty please, try to be nice yourself, too. I also removed the Obersturmbannfuhrer on Talk:Arthur Schopenhauer as a personal attack. -- Chris 73 Talk 01:14, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
- You started it with brutaly explused, poor victim of ethnic cleansing and defender of "Deutschtum" . if you feel attacked by the nationalist, then you should remove this comment, too. That's why i asked you not to do this in the first place, it just leads to more trouble. Chris 73 Talk 11:11, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
- There is a difference between calling someone a (german/polish) nationalist and calling somebody a nazi henchman. -- Chris 73 Talk 11:19, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
- While i don't know him as well as you do, it seems from his user page that he is not german. in any case, if you find the nationalist offensive, then you should not use it yourself. Also, even if he is german, he probably has no connecton to the nazi regime except his heritage. Could you at least try to be nice? -- Chris 73 Talk 11:41, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
- And, oh please, don't remove the disputed tag. You of all people should know that there IS a dispute on Lucas David, and Halibutt also told me to add a tag -- Chris 73 Talk 11:43, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
- While i don't know him as well as you do, it seems from his user page that he is not german. in any case, if you find the nationalist offensive, then you should not use it yourself. Also, even if he is german, he probably has no connecton to the nazi regime except his heritage. Could you at least try to be nice? -- Chris 73 Talk 11:41, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
- There is a difference between calling someone a (german/polish) nationalist and calling somebody a nazi henchman. -- Chris 73 Talk 11:19, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Zdjątka
Mówiłem Ci już że jesteś moim bogiem? :) Dodałem opis do obrazka i nie omieszkam go wykorzystać - dzięki wielkie (Mam Kossaka i nie zawaham się go użyć :D ). Co do Kohlera - będę miał oko. Halibutt 17:18, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
- Jednak tak, mam tę książkę w tej chwili na kolanach, i w stopce jest wyraźnie podany taki właśnie tytuł :) Halibutt 17:20, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Gdańsk i przyległości
Czołgiem! John K. poprosił mnie o pomoc w sprawie Wolnego Miasta. Nie do końca wiem o co tym razem poszło, ale redirect na Free City of Gdańsk nie ma dla mnie większego sensu. Dawno, dawno temu toczyliśmy niekończącą się wojnę o artykuł o Gdańsku i revertom nie było końca. Paru kolegów zza Odry (a tak naprawdę, jak się później okazało, zza Wielkiej Wody - tak to już bywa że emigranci się radykalizują...) nawet twierdziło, że to miasto do dziś się nazywa Danzig w angielszczyźnie.
Wtedy udało nam się dotrzeć do bolesnego kompromisu w sprawie nazewnictwa: gdzie to możliwe używamy nazw oficjalnie obowiązujących w danym państwie w danej epoce. Ma to swoje złe strony - bo Wolne Miasto się zwie z niemiecka, ale dzięki temu możemy uniknąć takich perełek jak "Uniwersytet Jana Kazimierza we L'vivie" czy kretynizmów w stylu "Ktośtam-ktośtam urodził się w 1929 w Vilniusie".
A teraz do rzeczy: czy masz naprawdę coś przeciwko temu kompromisowi (bo, jak widzę z historii edycji, chodzi wyłącznie o nazwę artykułu, nie o jego treść), czy też po prostu zacząłeś revertować bo pojawiła się jakaś anonimowa pacynka? Jeśli to drugie - to lepiej przestań, bo John ma ostatnio chyba zły okres i łaknie krwi :), a jeśli to pierwsze - spróbuj się z nimi dogadać na stronie dyskusji. Odkąd nie ma palantów w stylu Nico czy Wika (no dobrze, wiem że jest Gzornenplatzem, ale jednak trochę się zmienił), z Johnem i innymi naprawdę można się dogadać. --Pozdrowionka - Halibutt 22:15, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Glinsky
Jasne. Odpowiedzialem. A moglbys zerknac na Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates i zaglosowac w Bitwie Warszawskiej? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 14:00, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Ban
I'll look into your case, but you really should cool down. Accusing ppl of lying is *not* helping your case, not matter if you are right or not. And you really should avoid rv wars - ask for aribtration or such, but rv will lead, well, to ban...sooner or later, even if you are not the guilty party - wiesz, gdzie drwale rąbią... :>--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:37, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I agree with what Piotrus said. Don't let them ban you permanently for such a silly reason, you're too good at finding great pictures :D Halibutt 19:14, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)
-
- Wikipedia:Controversial blocks applies to the blocking admin, not to the blocked user. Also, next time you put me up as a request for arbitration, could you kindly let me know about it? -- Chris 73 Talk 16:24, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Interiors
Congratulations on the gorgeous photographs of the Presidential Palace, Warsaw. Would it be possible to identify more specifically each chamber that is pictured, rather than calling them all "Inside" (more properly, "Interior")? Logologist 08:05, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Your Controversial block
Why do You banned me yesterdey? Your block wasn't backed by official policy. And why do you simply ignored my emails?--Emax 14:05, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
- I replied to you in <20050202023811.GA22920@var.cx> which was delivered to your mailserver at Feb 2 03:37:37. --fvw* 17:52, 2005 Feb 3 (UTC)
-
- I dont received any emails from You.--Emax 17:58, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Users calling admins morons
Emax, I don't know anything about your dispute with Chris, but I thought I'd correct you on a statement you made on the arbitration page. Admins are called morons by users all the time. I've been called much, much worse. Granted, sometimes admins act like morons. But anyone who comes here to vandalize or make trouble specifically targets admins and says many nasty things to them. Sometimes they can be banned for violations of policy, but a user who shows up and simply leaves me nasty notes can sometimes hang around a long time -- months and months -- before they get banned. I know some people seem to feel, as you do, that admins ban people merely for offending them, but I can assure you that in 98% of the cases, admins endure huge amounts of undeserved abuse before a user is dealt with. I don't if that's true in your case, but it is very much true in general. Jwrosenzweig 18:37, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- As I said, I don't know anything about this particular case. Yes, admins should behave well, but so should users. Making fun of someone else's culture is rude and I don't want to see it around here, but I think it's very debatable to say that our site's policies demand serious consequences for someone saying such things. Plenty of people bash the United States on Wikipedia with regularity (and I've seen shots taken at France, England, all Islamic nations, wtc.) and I don't see that many of them are taken to task with any speed. I agree with you that it would be wrong to mock someone's culture, but I don't know that you're right that an admin doing these things would be treated any differently than a user. In any case, I hope there is no trouble in the future between you and Chris, and that all is resolved soon. Jwrosenzweig 19:13, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- KnowledgeSeeker is correct -- Chris's comment isn't vandalism. Again, please stop making guesses and assumptions about how things would be if Chris was doing this. If you called Chris a moron on his talk page, and he added a notice about that to Vandalism in progress, it would be removed also. Jwrosenzweig 22:25, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Your entry on Vandalism in Progress
Hi Emax, just wanted to let you know that I removed your entry on Vandalism in Progress. Please read the directions at the top of the page before posting an alert. The first sentences on the page are
- Please report vandalism at the top of the "Current alerts" list below. Please only use this page for repeated malicious vandalism, not for one-off edits, or newbie tests. Except in cases of vandalbot or other rapid-fire attacks, please warn users and wait for further vandalism before listing them here. Do not list non-vandalism (see Cautions and alternatives below).
I understand you may have been offended by a comment, but that does not qualify as vandalism—in fact, the vandalism page specifically mentions that personal attacks are not considered vandalism. Furthermore, the directions state to "only use this page for repeated malicious vandalism" and to "wait for further vandalism" before posting an entry. I hope this all makes sense. Why don't you take a look at the vandalism page, and feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Thanks! — Knowledge Seeker দ (talk) 20:49, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Emax, thanks for your question. Vandalism in Progress is definitely not the place for this, as it is neither vandalism nor "in progress." For one thing, it looks like this took place back on January 14th. Second, ViP is for users who are repeatedly vandalizing articles. The first step is to ask the user to stop; if he or she doesn't, and continues to vandalize articles, then the user should be listed on ViP. Since in this case, the episode occurred just once, it is not appropriate for ViP.
- With regards to your second question, I am not sure there is any page report such an action. If you are having a conflict with another user, dispute resolution lists the steps you can take. The first step, after avoidance, is to talk to the other person. If calling another user a moron was the only problem, then it would appear that the conflict is over, and no resolution is necessary. The other thing is that while you stated that he called another user a "moron", the diff you provided showed him adding "what a mXXXX." Did he use the word moron somewhere else? — Knowledge Seeker দ (talk) 21:52, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Emax, to me it looks like this matter has been resolved. I don't think you will find much success in pursuing this matter any longer. This is because it looks like Chris made a couple unfortunate comments, realized his error, and apologized for them. You seem concerned that he apologized after you mentioned the issue to Halibutt, but I don't think there is anything wrong with apologizing after someone else points out one's error. There really is no place to report this type of problem, because it is not really considered a "punishable offense" to let a make a couple comments with poor judgment, apologize, and then not do it again. This is why there hasn't been much support of these complaints—it has nothing to do with administrators versus ordinary users (note that I am not an administrator; I'm an ordinary user like you). What kind of action would you like to see against Chris? A 24-hour ban? That wouldn't really be appropriate, as the behavior in question has long passed. Twenty-four–hour bans are used not for punishment, but to stop users who are repeatedly vandalizing or disrupting Wikipedia. For instance, a user who is repeatedly vandalizing articles despite requests to stop might be blocked for twenty-four hours; this will let the user cool down and hopefully either he will be more rational when resuming editing or he will lose interest in Wikipedia. However, if someone had repeatedly vandalized pages last week but was never blocked, it would not be appopriate to block now since the vandalism had stopped. Does this make sense? You are of course free to continue how you wish, but my suggestion would be that unless Chris has continued with problematic comments, you let this matter rest. Not only has he not made any new offensive comments, but he has recognized the inappropriateness of them and apologized. Many Wikipedia users wouldn't even give you that. In any case, as he clearly does not fit the criteria for a twenty-four–hour ban, I cannot see what else could be accomplished by continued pursuit of this matter. I think the best thing to do at this point would be to accept Chris's apologies, and to work together now to improve Wikipedia. If you have any questions or have any problems, or would like to discuss this further, please let me know. Thanks! — Knowledge Seeker দ (talk) 08:09, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I agree with everything Knowledge Seeker said above, but I would like to add that labeling an established user as "vandal" by repeatedly adding comments of that nature to WP:VIP (against the page's charter and without any evidence) could be in itself interpreted as a personal attack. jni 10:19, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Mediation, Vandalism, & Arthur Schopenhauer
Hi. Again, if you do a Wikipedia:Requests for mediation, it would be nice if you could let all involved parties know about it. Same applies to Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress, but I guess that one is now no longer relevant. In general I would recommend you to calm down. If you want to discuss items with me, please let me know on my talk page, and I am happy to respond. Also, on Wikipedia:Requests for mediation, it is usually common to have a meditation between two parties, not against one party, so you may change the header to Chris 73 vs Emax or so.
Also, you may have noticed that Arthur Schopenhauer is currently protected. This is so that a discussion can be worked out on the talk page. As you are one of the involved parties in the previous dispute, you are very welcome to join the discussion, hopefully we can come to a solution, so there is no continuation of the edit war. -- Chris 73 Talk 03:51, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Addendum: I am writing down your steps just in case. Your current behavior is not really proper. I still hope that I won't need those notes. I have taken occasionally notes of other users behavior, too, and so far never had the need to use them, as I was able to come to a peaceful solution. So, please give it a try. -- Chris 73 Talk 03:54, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] view of justice
About your three points: (1) I don't know any helga. The anonymous editor seemed to make reasonable edits as far as i checked. (2) I have apologized to SpaceCadet, an apology which he seemed to have accepted. (3) For the culture thing, I have apologized on Halibutt's talk page, which he seemed to have accepted. Hence I believe this issue to be resolved. Judging from the response on the Requests for arbitration, Vandalism in progress listing, Requests for mediation, and various comments on Administrators' noticeboard/3RR and my talk page so far the general consensus seems to agree with me. You may of course have different views, although I cannot make everybody happy. As for the suggestion of a 24th (24 hour?) block or a 1 month abstain from polish articles: Using the same rules this would also apply to you, and I believe you have more questionable comments in your edit history than me. -- Chris 73 Talk 04:19, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay in answering. (1) No I don't know helga, and the edits i saw by the anon were in general good. I also did not know Ghirlandajo and Gene s before. (2) In my eyes an apology suffices, especially since the apology was sincere. You seem to have exhausted most of the dispute resolution methods (Arbitration was rejected, Vandalism was not appropriate, and theMeditation is somewhat hanging in the air since the link you gave refers to the now-removed arbitration request). If you really want to continue a request for more strict actions, I think the only thing left you could do as part of the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution would be a Wikipedia:Requests for comment. However, I would advise you to listen to the numerous other users commenting on your talk page to see this matter as settled (3) About your block: You broke the 3RR, as confirmed by other admins (and, believe me, admins looked at the facts on the 3RR noticeboard). This rule applies to everyone, and if you see another user reverting a page more than three times in 24 hours, please feel free to request a block. I will be happy to block the user (including myself). (Note: This applies to recent cases, not something that happened in December or so). Also, in case it happens to you again, please use email and IRC to contact admins, and do NOT edit using an anonymous IP adress for block evasion. -- Chris 73 Talk 11:18, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Prosba o pomoc - blitzkrieg
Co prawda to nie dotyczy bezposrednio Polski, ale bylbym wdzieczny gdybys zerknal na Talk:Blitzkrieg#Inaccurate_changes i ten revert. Byc moze nie mam racji - nie chce samotnie zaczynac rv wara z tym 119. Ale jesli uwazasz, ze mam racje, bylbym wdzieczny gdybys wspomnial o tym na talku tej strony i ew. zrewertowal 119. Dzieki. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:44, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Taka bzdura
Spojrz prosze na Arthur Schopenhauer/Temp. Ryniek aka Space Cadet 02:14, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Pałac Saski
Thanks for bringing "Pałac Saski" to my attention. I've expanded it a little. Hope the Palace does get rebuilt: it's a world-class historic site. Logologist 17:07, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- P.S. A goodly floor space in the rebuilt Saxon Palace should be reserved for an Enigma-decryption museum and world center for Enigma-related research and international conferences. (It was here that the course of World War II was changed, nearly 7 years before its outbreak, by 3 Polish mathematician-cryptologists.)
- With your remarkable illustration-finding skills, I'm sure you could track down a photo of the Belweder Palace (preferably with its most important tenant, Józef Piłsudski, lounging in front of it?). Logologist 05:43, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] You have been blocked
You have been block from editing for 24 hours for breaking the wikipedia 3 revert ruleGeni 02:13, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Commons:
Please upload Polish history related public domain images directly on commons:. They are definitely sharable between English/Polish/Belarusian (which one I forget? :-) Wikipedias. Thank you for your great job! --EugeneZelenko 03:31, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Enigma cryptologists
I've redone the article on Marian Rejewski. It would be nice if photos could be found of him and his colleagues, Jerzy Różycki and Henryk Zygalski. Logologist 11:54, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for digging up a picture of Różycki. Are you sure, though, that the image is public domain? — Matt Crypto 14:04, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Dziękuję za piękne zdjęcia polskich kryptologów-enigmatologów! (For our Polophonically-challenged friends: "Thanks for the beautiful photos of the Polish Enigma cryptologists!") Logologist 05:14, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hi! Your work in digging up photos for these cryptographers is part of this month's "project digest" in cryptography: Wikipedia:WikiProject Cryptography/February 2005. Thanks again! — Matt Crypto 13:29, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] This is the English Wikipedia
Please do not carry on conversations in foreign languages on Talk pages for articles. This is inappropriate and inconsiderate to your fellow editors. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 18:55, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Helikoptery
Dzięki. Mamy to gdzieś na piśmie? (żeby wiedziec co powoływać w opisie - zwłaszcza odnośnie obrazków?) Pibwl 16:47, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nie wiem, czy Świdnik zdaje sobie sprawę, na czym polega udostępnienie materiałów na licencji GFDL :-) Odnośnie zdjęć, byłbym więc ostrożny - a z fairuse nie będą się nadawały na polską Wiki. Zresztą, patrzę na tą stronę i chyba i tak nie ma problemu, bo zdjęcia są mikre :-) Pibwl 17:34, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] NBP
Ha! Jak ochrzcic taką licencje???
Niki K 00:06, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Vote on Talk:Gdansk/Vote
Hi. Since you have edited on pages with disputes about the names of Polish/German locations, I would invite you to vote on Talk:Gdansk/Vote to settle the multi-year dozens-of-pages dispute about the naming of Gdansk/Danzig and other locations. The vote has two parts, one with questions when to use Gdansk/Danzig, and a second part affecting articles related to locations with Polish/German history in general. An enforcement is also voted on. The vote has a total of 10 questions to vote on, and ends in two weeks on Friday, March 4 0:00. Thank you -- Chris 73 Talk 11:40, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Masuria & Gizycko
Czesc!
Mozesz uzasadnic dlaczego usunales kategorie 'East Prussia' z artykulow w naglowku?
Pozdrawiam
KKramer 14:46, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Uzasadnienie umieszeczenia kategorii:
Prusy Wschodnie są krainą historyczną do której zarówno (dzisiejsze) Giżycko jak i całe Maury bezsprzecznie należały. Co więcej pod pojęciem Mazur rozumiano ich całkiem sporą część. Przyporządkowanie ich do tej kategorii wskazuje na położenie w historii, a nawet bardziej bo wskazuje na korzenie regionu. Nie przyporządkowuje ich to za w żaden sposób do dzisiejszych Niemiec.
Umieszczając tą kategorię chcę dać czytającemu, który ma na ogół bardzo niewielką wiedzę na ten temat, możliwość lepszego umiejscowienia nie tylko w przestrzeni ale też w czasie (historii).
Jak łatwo można się domyślić pochodzę z Giżycka i muszę przyznać, że nigdy nie przeszkadzała mi jego pruska przeszłość. Jeden (a w zasadzie wszystkie) z ważniejszych zabytków Giżcyka - twierdza Boyen - pochodzi z XIX wieku i odgrywał bardzo ważną rolę w pruskim systemie umocnień. Jest jednak bezsprzecznie pruską budowlą.
Tak jak Białystok jest bezsprzecznie polskim miastem od wieków, tak Giżycko było bardzo długo miastem pruskim i to tworzy bardzo istotną część jego historii.
Wystarczy jako uzasadnienie?
KKramer 19:30, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wladek
Jak pisalem juz w Talku kilka dni temu, seckja elekcja powtarza informacje z reignu. Po co pisac kiedy zostal wybrany jak wyzej pisze od kiedy do kiedy panowal? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:11, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] witaj, dzięki za pomoc przy Wojciech Jastrzebowski
Nie do końca wiem - może mnie uświadomisz? Dlaczego hasła en wikipedii nie pojawiają się od razu. Hasło twórcy nauko - ergonomii pisałem dwukrotnie - łamaną angielszczyzną... i dopiero ta druga wersja pojawiła się na stronie z kilkudniowmy opóźnieniem. Myślę, że mają jakieś zabezpieczenia albo Ty tą stronę wyłowiłeś z uznanych do skasowania. A może się mylę?
Pozdrawiam :-) 217. ..
[edit] Orleta lwowskie
Czy moglbys przeniesc obraz Image:Orleta.jpg z angielskiej Wikipedii do Common? Nie bardzo wiem, jak to zrobic, a chcialbym go wstawic do polskiej strony o Orletach, nad ktora (nieustannie) pracuje. Pozdrawiam Stako 07:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Rank insignia gallery.
I was just browsing through User:Emax/Image gallery/Stopnie, and I noticed that (a) the images aren't copyright-tagged, and (b) are in JPG format. PNG works better for drawings like those. I don't think there are copyright problems with drawing insignia on your own, but I dropped a line to the reference desk to ask about it. I'm going to start converting the JPGs to PNGs and listing the originals for deletion---you'll notice me editing that gallery page during this process. Since you didn't specify a license, and your user page specifies that your contributions are multi-licensed GFDL, cc-by-sa and cc-by-sa-2.0, I'll be attributing original creation of the images to you, and tagging them with that copyright. If you have questions or objections, reply here or drop a note on my userpage.
Thanks! grendel|khan 02:36, 2005 Feb 27 (UTC)
[edit] Template:Szlachta ?
I was thinking of making a template in place of current bioboxes in our szlachta article. First, I am thinking if it should be Template:Szlachta or Template:Szlachcic (but what about szlachcianka?). Second, I was looking for an existing bio templage but couldn't find any at Wikipedia:Template messages - do you know which one we can use? Or should we create an entirely new template? I was thinking of following sections: Noble Family, Coat of Arms, Offices (that's one important thing that is missing from our current hand mande boxes), Parents, Consorts, Children, Place and Date of Birth, Place and Date of Death. Finally, we can also use a variant of that for our kings. What do you think? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:58, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright
Is Image:Antoniuk.jpg, which you made and uploaded, licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License? --Ellmist 02:17, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Templates for Deletion
Hi. You probably already know that some of your templates have been listed for deletion on TfD. Or maybe you don't know, since the TfD are very sneaky in not informing the people who actually use or create the templates!
It's a shame that TfD is dominated by a handful of people with a grudge against large, useful navigational templates, and want to see them all replaced by smaller, incomplete, less useful ones. And for some of the more fanatical members, even that's not enough; they want to remove all navigational templates and force everyone to only use Categories to find related articles! Maybe lovers of big templates should mobilise ourselves and make a permanent presence on TfD to argue against deleting them? Otherwise, this is just the thin end of the wedge! Miss Pippa 11:13, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Dziwie sie, ze nie wypowiedziales sie jeszcze przy Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Chancellors. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 13:10, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Templates
Hello. I notice you did a template on the Marshal of Poland. I was wondering what advice can you give me on templates, since I want to make a template on Marshals of the Soviet Union. Thanks. Zscout370 22:05, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Bema.jpg
Did you create Image:Bema.jpg yourself? If so, please replace {{unverified}} with {{gfdl}}, or whatever tag you feel is appropriate. Thanks, LeonWhite.
[edit] Image:Bialostoczek.jpg
Same applies for Image:Bialostoczek.jpg. Thanks, LeonWhite 18:38, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC).
[edit] Help is needed in Zaklikow
Hello Emax. I recently started and still working on Zaklikow. Your help will be appreciated in the article. I saw you helped in Sosnowiec. Do your magic!--AAAAA 15:04, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Co sie stalo 18 lutego?
Emaxie, zniknales nam z Wiki tego dnia. Brakuje nam ciebie... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 11:59, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright tags
Thanks for uploading Skorupy.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, Casito⇝Talk 02:04, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Herb Topór
Topór powinien być zwrócony w lewą stronę patrząc z punktu widzenia trzymającego tarczę, a więc w prawo dla patrzącego na tarczę. jak tu Wybacz, że do ciebie żale kieruję, ale ty wstawiłeś obrazek.
[edit] Image:German Soviet.jpg
Hello, could you please add info on the source to this image? I have provisionally put it on WP:IFD, as it looks slightly dodgy to me without that info. --213.54.206.35 09:53, 9 May 2005 (UTC) Has been cleared up, I found the source and added it to the image page. --213.54.206.35 10:29, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] VfD: Nazi or German Occupation?
Check this VfD vote: [1] --Ttyre 19:17, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image license
[edit] Image copyright
Thank you for uploading Image:Image:Sloneczny Stok.jpg and for stating the source. However, its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. If it is open content or public domain, please give proof of this on the image page. If the image is fair use, please provide a rationale. Thank you.
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Sosnowiec Flaga.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Sosnowiec Flaga.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Copy any tag from pl wiki to eng wiki.
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Sosnowiec Herb.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Sosnowiec Herb.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Copy any tag from pl wiki to eng wiki.
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Sosnowiec Mapa.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Sosnowiec Mapa.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Copy any tag from pl wiki to eng wiki.
[edit] Image:Zygmunt Berling.jpg
| Image deletion warning | The image Image:Zygmunt Berling.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information. |
[edit] lots of edits, not an admin
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. It looks like you've left, but if you come back and are at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. I've marked you on this list as "inactve". Feel free to update this as well. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) July 3, 2005 17:29 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Jozef Oleksy.jpg
[edit] Image:Jozef Oleksy.jpg
| Image deletion warning | Image:Jozef Oleksy.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
--Admrboltz 4 July 2005 10:08 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Jozef Pilsudski.JPG
[edit] Image:Jozef Pilsudski.JPG
| Image deletion warning | Image:Jozef Pilsudski.JPG has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
--Admrboltz 4 July 2005 10:11 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Anti-Polonism vfd
Hi: Category:Anti-Polonism has been listed for a vote for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Anti-Polonism. Thank you. IZAK 5 July 2005 10:07 (UTC)
[edit] Image:PSP Dywizjon 303.jpg has been listed for deletion
| An image or media file you uploaded, Image:PSP Dywizjon 303.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |
[edit] Info on image, please
Please go to Image:Palac Saski.jpg and edit that image description page to give the source (URL, if online; ISBN, if scanned from a book; and if you've taken the image yourself, just say so) and the licensing status (the list of image copyright tags might be useful) of this image. All our images should have this information. Thank you. Lupo 11:41, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Zawieszenie dzwonu Zygmunta na wiezy katedry w roku 1521 w Krakowie.jpg
I'm a bit unsure about the {{pd}} yag on this image; what's the basis for it? Could you post the image source? (The painting itself isn't the issue, but the photograph of it; postcards, illustrations in magazines or on websites, etc., almost certainly won't be public domain). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:22, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Translation of terms?
Greetings - These terms appear after "Starost" in your article: perejasławski, korsuński, płoskirowski and doliński. Are these adjectives? Would you mind claifying within the article what those words mean, either with a link or a definition? Thanks very much. Her Pegship 22:28, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oops, shoulda been more specific. It's the "Aleksander Koniecpolski" that needs clarification of terms. Thanks. Her Pegship 21:09, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:FaustynaSiostra.jpg has been listed for deletion
| An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:FaustynaSiostra.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |
Thuresson 08:48, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Michnik Jaruzelski 1989.jpg
Hi, please add a source for this photo. Thuresson 13:00, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- Please add a source for this image as quickly as possible. Thuresson 23:08, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Hetman Maly.jpg has been listed for deletion
| An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Hetman Maly.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |
[edit] Image:Stanis&-322;aw Kania.jpg has been listed for deletion
| An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Stanis&-322;aw Kania.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |
[edit] Image:Herb Sas.jpg
hey, good job on creating the images of the herb, i'm very impressed, did you draw them all yourself? i was wondering if we could move all the herbs into the Wikimedia Commons [2], in case users wanted to use them for other language wikipedias, do you know what i mean? keep up the good work... czesz Gryffindor 14:09, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Białystok population graph
Hi, I've remade the Białystok population graph uploaded by you (Image:Population Bialystok.jpg). The new image is named Image:Bialystok population graph.png. I saved it in PNG format which is better for graphs, removed the caption, made the X axis linear and added 10-year labels to it. The original has been listed for deletion—hope this is OK. –Mysid 12:23, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Polish maps
I've replaced a bunch of Polish maps uploaded by you with palette-reduced PNG versions. The originals are up for deletion. –Mysid 11:55, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Zrodla
Znalazlem swoje nazwisko na stronie dotyczacej herbu szreniawa - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szreniawa_Coat_of_Arms Czy moze Pan podac zrodla z jakich korzystal Pan dopisujac nazwiska wlascicieli herbu? Do tej pory nie wiedzialem, ze moja rodzina ma szlachecki herb i chetnie zweryfikowalbym te wiedze.
z gory dziekuje za odpowiedz
Lukasz Anforowicz (anforowicz@yahoo.com)
[edit] Various dormant templates
You created the following templates, but they remain empty - I intend to nominate them for deletion, if you have no plan to resume work on them. The templates are:Template:Sq 300, Template:Sq_301, Template:Sq_302, Template:Sq_304, Template:Sq_305, Template:Sq_306, Template:Sq_307, Template:Sq_308, Template:Sq_309, Template:Sq_315, Template:Sq_316, Template:Sq_317, Template:Sq_318, Template:Sq_663. BD2412 T 22:32, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Krzysztof Kieslowski.jpg
 |
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Krzysztof Kieslowski.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Thuresson 18:26, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Karol Radziwiłł (Panie Kochanku)
Nie mógłbyś wrzucać fotek na Commons? Nie mam jak ziliustrować przetłumaczonego i uzupełnionego artykułu [Karol Radziwiłł] bez dublowania się --Man pl 00:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Zubr.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Zubr.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 09:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Picture of the day
Hi Emax,
Just to let you know that your painting Image:Przysiega Kosciuszki.jpg, that you nominated for WP:FPC is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on the 16th February. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Wikipedia:Picture of the day/February 16, 2006. -- 21:15, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Jerzy_Kukuczka.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jerzy_Kukuczka.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 05:34, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Uchwalenie Konstytucji 3 Maja.jpg
hi Emax, thank you for uploading these really impressive images. However, there seems to be the source missing, please provide it as soon as possible. Also if you have any further images that you uploaded, please make sure that they have a source, regardless if they are considered public domain or not. this includes Image:Przysiega Kosciuszki.jpg, Image:Koronacja Chrobrego Matejko.jpg, etc. with kind regards Gryffindor 19:06, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Potega Rzeczypospolitej u zenitu Zlota wolnosc Elekcja 1573.JPG
 |
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Potega Rzeczypospolitej u zenitu Zlota wolnosc Elekcja 1573.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Tadeusz_Mazowiecki1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tadeusz_Mazowiecki1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] your images
hi Emax, thank you for uploading all these pictures of Polish history and the polish nobility. However, many of your images are missing a source, for example Image:Jan Klemens Branicki.jpg. Even if they are in the public domain, they should show where the source of the images are. Please take a good look. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask, with kind regards Gryffindor 14:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NOTICE TO ADMINISTRATORS AND USERS
To everyone who is handling images uploaded by User:Emax. User has not contributed anything since 17:59, February 18, 2005 [3] (this information is of 09 March 2006). Anyone wanting to delete images uploaded by this user, please try to find the source yourself with a google search or something similar. thank you. Gryffindor 18:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Kazimierz Gzowski.jpg
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Kazimierz Gzowski.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an arguement why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Matt 07:36, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:100zl_a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:100zl_a.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:54, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed (user removed {{money}}.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:44, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Saks - jakie odznaczenie
W angielskiej jest Walecznych, W polskiej Zasługi. Xx236 11:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:10gr_a.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:10gr_a.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Fixed (as above).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:10gr_r.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:10gr_r.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 08:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed as above.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Henryk_II_Pobozny.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Henryk_II_Pobozny.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- Fair use for now.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Henryk_IV_Probus.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Henryk_IV_Probus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 10:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- Fair use for now.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:44, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Polish general insignias considered for deletion
[edit] Image:General_Brygady.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:General_Dywizji.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:General_Broni.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:General_Czterogwiazdkowy1.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:General_Brygady_Lotnicze.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:General_Dywizji_Lotnicze.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:General_Broni_Lotnicze.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:General_Czterogwiazdkowy_Lotnicze.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:General_Brygady_Poziom.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:General_Dywizji_Poziom.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:General_Broni_Poziom.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:General Poziom.jpg listed for deletion
Jecowa 03:33, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] admiral images for deletion
[edit] Image:Kontradmiral.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:Admiral_Floty.jpg listed for deletion
[edit] Image:Admiral_Polska.jpg listed for deletion
Jecowa 04:21, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] test
test
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Janusz_Radziwill_(1612-1655)_2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Janusz_Radziwill_(1612-1655)_2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Found a lower quality source for now.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:11, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Jozef_Potocki.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jozef_Potocki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:57, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Found a lower quality source for now.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Seweryn_Rzewuski_(1743-1811).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Seweryn_Rzewuski_(1743-1811).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Eustachy_Erazm_Sanguszko.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Eustachy_Erazm_Sanguszko.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Found and fixed.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Franciszek_Selazy_Potocki.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Franciszek_Selazy_Potocki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Alfred Jozef Potocki (1822-1889).jpg
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Alfred Jozef Potocki (1822-1889).jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Hetar 06:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Source found, fixed.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Witold Lokuciewski Feric.jpg
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Witold Lokuciewski Feric.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 02:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Rzeczpospolita Gazeta.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Rzeczpospolita Gazeta.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kimchi.sg 08:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Herb Gmina Michalowo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Herb Gmina Michalowo.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Angr 10:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Zdjęcie Kani
Image:Stanislaw Kania.jpg Czy pamiętasz, skąd je zeskanowałeś? Jeśli nie, może być problem na Commons :/ A.J. 12:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Herb_Lubuskie.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Herb_Lubuskie.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:43, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 09:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Herb_Warmia_Mazury.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Herb_Warmia_Mazury.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 09:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Jan_Brozek.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jan_Brozek.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 09:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:61 Fighter Squadron Piloci.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:61 Fighter Squadron Piloci.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 03:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Orzelek.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Orzelek.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Krzysztof Radziwill (1585-1640).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Krzysztof Radziwill (1585-1640).jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. A.J. 12:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Jerzy_Popieluszko.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jerzy_Popieluszko.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Added source.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 14:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Leopold_Stokowski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Leopold_Stokowski.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ribbentrop_Molotow.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ribbentrop_Molotow.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Kalisz Herb.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kalisz Herb.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you.
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Aleksander_Zawadzki.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aleksander_Zawadzki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:49, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Added source.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 14:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Hieronim Augustyn Lubomirski (1647-1706).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hieronim Augustyn Lubomirski (1647-1706).jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 12:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Added source.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 16:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Obwodnica Bialobrzegow.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Obwodnica Bialobrzegow.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a simmilar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Edward 15:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Aleksander Kwasniewski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aleksander Kwasniewski.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 02:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mapa P.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mapa P.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 15:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Herb_Pogon_Ruska.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Herb_Pogon_Ruska.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Gliwice_Mapa.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Gliwice_Mapa.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:Herb Przegonia.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 01:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Bielsko_Biala_Herb.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Bielsko_Biala_Herb.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:42, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Dabrawa_Gornicza_Herb.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Dabrawa_Gornicza_Herb.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Bialystok Uniwersytet.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bialystok Uniwersytet.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:18 pulk ulanow pomorskich 1939.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:18 pulk ulanow pomorskich 1939.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Herb Orzel Piastowski.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Herb Orzel Piastowski.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kpalion 23:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Stanislaw Zolkiewski (1547-1620).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stanislaw Zolkiewski (1547-1620).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. |EPO| 23:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Source found.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 01:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:F16 Polska.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:F16 Polska.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Tadeusz_Borowski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tadeusz_Borowski.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Wladyslaw Sikorski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wladyslaw Sikorski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Denniss 22:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Jozef Pilsudski na Kasztance.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jozef Pilsudski na Kasztance.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 88.134.140.64 03:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Narutowicz_Pilsudski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Narutowicz_Pilsudski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 18:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Source found.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 01:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Jozef Pilsudski w Poznaniu.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jozef Pilsudski w Poznaniu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jesse Viviano 19:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Jozef Pilsudski4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jozef Pilsudski4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jesse Viviano 19:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Stefan Wyszynski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stefan Wyszynski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nicke L 21:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
| This user is inactive since 10:59, 18 February 2005.
This user is also not replying to emails. If you have any questions about this user, you might find help at Wikipedia talk:Polish Wikipedians' notice board. We also help with finding sources and licenses for the images! |
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Herb K Maly.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Herb K Maly.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Liftarn 15:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
