User talk:Eluchil404

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello, Eluchil404, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

The Wookieepedian 20:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Re:American Professional Football League

I contested the deletion, because the one who deleted it said he had no problems with it being recreated if there were external sources. I am adding some, so please let it stay. Tom Danson 17:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Locker

Did you close this AfD discussion without deleting it? Are you aware that non-admins can only close unambiguous keep AfDs? Please read this section of the deletion process for further details. Regards, (aeropagitica) 18:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

That section of the deletion policy has been rewritten slightly since I read it last, and I apologise if I was too bold in closing the AfD. Since it was an unambiguous G7 speedy I thought it best to simply tag it and end the discussion rather than tag it and wait for an admin to delete it before closing the AfD. Eluchil404 02:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

If you don't have the power to enforce your decision then closing the discussion isn't an option. I'm not aware of a previous time when non-admins were permitted to close discussions that resulted in a 'delete' consensus. It is good that you have now reviewed and are now aware of the current policy about closing AfDs. Regards, (aeropagitica) 02:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Northern Irish people

I have left you a reply on my talk page. --Mal 07:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BWW

Thanks. The important question is whether to have a page titled Bill Britt with a section on BWW, or to have a page titled BWW with a section on Bill Britt. I suggest the latter, it is broader. Most publicly available information about the person is in connection with the organization. But that means reorganizing the article and I guess having a redirect in the opposite direction. -- Knverma 14:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your closure of Stefan Dohr AfD

I see you removed the AfD template for Stefan Dohr and added the {{oldafdfull}} template to its talk page. However, you forgot to close the AfD discussion. The directions for closing an AfD are found at Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Articles_for_Deletion_page. You should also review Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Non-administrators_closing_discussions. Agent 86 01:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "not really a darwin-wedgwood tree"

You might as well say the same about darwin (this is not really a darwin - wedegwood tree, just darwin) or wedgwood (this is not realy a darwin - wdegwood tree, just wedgwood!).

[edit] Keynes family

It seems as if, through the magic of the newly transformed superior?links, "Keynes family" now just points to "John maynard keynes" (ignoring other family menmbers and indeed your tree connecting various other keynes).

Additionally, "de Keynes" now points to "john maynard Keynes". It was much more sensible as it was!ken 06:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Through my very simple "original research" I believe I have just discovered that the inventor and legendary "bouncing bomb" creator Barnes Wallis is almost certainly the cousin of Geoffrey Keynes. Barnes middle name is Neville and his father supposedly had a lover/wife called Fanny Bloxam - I believe she was in fact Fanny Keynes (possibly married to a Bloxam before or during the relationship) , (half) sister of Geoffrey Keynes's c1887 and also John Maynard Keynes, father John Keynes c1852. This relationship will become another victim of censorship without publication in "conventional" (outdated?) printed works for review by outdated peer review in several years time - if anyone bothers to publish this single but interesting fact ken 23:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding overturning non-admin AfD's

I agree with you totally, and your statement matched my initial thoughts. I just wasn't sure exactly what the current status was, so I thank you for your clarification. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 08:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Catholic-link deletion review

You endorsed the "no consensus" ruling, and I have addressed this at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Template:Catholic-link, where I invite you to take a second look. Cheers! — coelacan talk — 10:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TeckWiz's RFA

TeckWiz's RFA
I would like to thank you for voting in support of my second RFA. I withdrew per WP:SNOW, as consensus to promote was against me. I will continue to improve until one day, I become an admin. Thanks, and happy editing! --TeckWizTalk Contribs@ 21:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Newyorkbrad's RfA

Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 19:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tall women, List of tall men

Please see new combined deletion debate. ~ trialsanderrors 20:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Garion96's RFA

Thank you for your support in my request for adminship which closed successfully last night. Feel free to let me know if I can help you with something or if I have made a mistake. I would also like to encourage you to vote often (just in case you don't) on other candidates since we need more admins. Also, thank you for changing your vote from neutral to support. Happy editing, Garion96 (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia talk:Notability/overview‎

There is a centralized discussion on notability at Wikipedia talk:Notability/overview‎, which is linked from the pump. --Kevin Murray 13:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Just wanted to add on the Notability/Overview section

You stated that WP:N is a policy... that is technically incorrect. It is a guideline. DanielZimmerman 14:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Clarification please

Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(films)#AfD_.28Second.29

Thanks. Travb (talk) 01:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiproject Narnia Newsletter March 2007

WikiProject Narnia Newsletter
Issue 1 - 2nd March 2007 . Written by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs)
WikiProject Narnia News
  • The WikiProject has been a little quiet lately. There are still quite a lot of Narnia stubs. It has been nearly three months since we last worked on Minor characters in The Chronicles of Narnia, which still looks very much like a draft page. That would be a nice article to get into the main namespace.
Good and Featured Articles
Other news
  • WikiProject Narnia's first newsletter issue has been published. You're looking at it right now!
Member News
To-do
  1. Add characters and bios to minor character draft page.
  2. Expand Narnia stubs.
  3. Place links to the Narnia Portal on article pages by using {{portal|Narnia}}.
  4. Add the stub template {{Narnia-stub}} to articles in the category Category:Stub-Class Narnia articles so that there are the same number of articles in Category:Narnia stubs.
  5. Link the first mention of a year in all Narnia-related articles to Narnian timeline.
  6. Rewrite character articles to use the Narnian character example article format.
  7. Adopt an article and improve it to the best of your ability.
  8. Wikify The Chronicles of Narnia article, especially the new lead and Narnian Universe sections
From the founder

I am proud to present our first issue of the WikiProject Narnia Newsletter. I decided that we needed to alert everybody who had expressed interest in the project that there is much work to be done! Please check in every once in a while at the project talk page, and tell other project members what you've been up to in terms of Narnia articles.

Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c ||
Article of the Month: Edmund Pevensie
  • Edmund Pevensie is a major character in The Chronicles of Narnia. He appears as a principal character in three of the seven books. Edmund was the second to enter Narnia, although he tried to betray his siblings to the White Witch. However, Edmund managed to help save Narnia by neutralizing the White Witch's most powerful weapon, her wand.
Collaboration of the Month: Shasta (Narnia)
  • Shasta is currently quite short and not much of his background has been mentioned. The article also lacks images – but make sure if you upload one, you include a FU rationale. Contribute!

[edit] Fair-use images removed from your user page

Hello, Eluchil404. I've removed some images from User:Eluchil404/Test, as they are copyrighted, unlicensed images that are being used on Wikipedia under claims of fair use. Unfortunately, by Wikipedia policies, no fair-use images can be used on user pages; please see the ninth item of the Wikipedia fair-use policy and Wikipedia:Removal of fair use images. These images have not been deleted from any articles. If you have any questions, please let me know. —Bkell (talk) 21:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Mayan languages FA nomination restarted

The FA nomination of Mayan languages where you had expressed your opinion has been restarted because of substantial changes having been made to the article. You might wish to restate your opinion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mayan language.·Maunus· ·ƛ· 11:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../e/l/u/User_talk%7EEluchil404_8664.html"