User talk:Elsanaturk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Elsanaturk! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Khoikhoi 10:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

[edit] Please

Hi. I'm not sure exactly why you made this edit, which sounds a bit like a personal attack; but I'd advise you not to do so again, because uncivil comments, no matter how justified, tend to aggravate a situation. Cheers. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 22:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for 24 hours for the edit warring on Azerbaijan Democratic Republic. Please do not edit war again; when you see a conflict brewing, take it to the talk page. It's really the best option; edit warring will just get you into plenty of pointless trouble. —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 05:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Revert parole

I'm hereby informing you that both you and Azerbaijani have been placed on a strict "1RR parole" on the following two articles you have been edit warring on recently:

• Mammed Amin Rasulzade
• Azerbaijan Democratic Republic

Until further notice, neither of you may make more than one revert on those two articles in 24 hours (and that includes reverting not only each other but other editors as well) or you may be blocked by administrators for edit warring. The above list maybe expanded if either of you decide to carry your disputes to other related articles. Khoikhoi 11:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

I'll get back to you soon; there's currently an arbitration going on, so we'll see there that goes. Khoikhoi 09:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Arbitration

Hi. I added you to list of parties to an arbitration case initiated by Dmcdevit. Please make a statement at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Armenia-Azerbaijan concerning the conflict with the other parties listed. Thanks. Artaxiad 03:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 18:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] pls

[edit] Notice of Arbitration Committee injunction

The Arbitration Committee has adopted a temporary injunction in the case of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan, in which you have been named as a party. The injunction provides: Until the conclusion of this case, all parties are restricted to one content revert per article per day, and each content revert must be accompanied by a justification on the relevant talk page. Violators may be blocked for up to 24 hours. The case remains open for the submission of evidence or proposals. This notice is given by a Clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad 00:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rasulzade

www.resulzade.org cannot be used as a source! How many times do I have to tell you this? Secondly, that information has nothing to do with the section. I'll give you a chance to revert yourself or I'll report you to an admin. You also removed "a broken man", which comes directly from Goltz.Azerbaijani 20:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

just explain me why rasulzade.org cannot be a source and that mp3 file which was recorded by VOA what to do with by rasulzade org stuff? it is recorded by VOA . is VOA is less reliable than your million dollar babies? I state again, it is a recording of rasulzade's speech and has nothing to do with rasulzade org stuff. Elsanaturk 21:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Reason 1: It is not a third party source. Reason 2: It is not academic. I'm sick of these double standards. If you insist on keeping that, then I can dig up several Iranian sources too. I have already reported you for breaking 1rr, since I gave you a chance and you decided not to take it.Azerbaijani 00:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

It could also be considered original research. Out of possibly many speeches you have chosen to highlight one comment made in one. If the editors can't agree on this, you could try to find a newspaper article of the time or a more recent biography or something that points to this speech as significant and reference it that way. If there are no serious disputes about authenticity or copyright, the speech might be appropriate as an external link. Thatcher131 03:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Warning: Looks like a technical violation [1] [2], plus "do not remove mp3!" hardly counts as discussion. You get one freebie with me, and that's all. Thatcher131 03:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] cebeci

done. Enjoy!!!Istanbuljohnm 05:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] That IP warning

IP addresses are provided by your internet connection. Depending on how you connect to the internet, your IP address can change with every new connection (every time you dial in, for example, or whenever you reset your dsl modem). That warning message was meant for whoever made some anonymous vandal edits in September. You apparently live in the same general area so when you connected to the internet that day, you were randomly assigned that IP address and saw the old warning. On other days you are assigned other address from the same pool. It doesn't have anything to do with you and you can ignore it. Thatcher131 14:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)