User talk:Eloil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) will produce your name and the current date. You should always sign talk pages, but not articles. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ann Heneghan (talk) 01:00, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Pubic Wars
This article could really use some references that document use of the term in the media. Eloil 04:51, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, but I believe the term was used by the mass media. This needs verification indeed. Why do you think the tone is inappropriate for an encyclopedia? The Ogre 05:09, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
- Mostly because of this: "Eventually Playboy decided to take the high road (providing more artfull nudity) while Penthouse and Hustler (even more so) decided to provide even more explicit images." I'm new to this; maybe I was going overboard with the tags. Do you think that one should be removed? Eloil 05:19, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
- User User:Velho has already removed it. I also think it is not inappropriate for an encyclopedia, even if it can be better phrased (why don't you try?) and it certainly needs verification. By the way, the best way to reply is in the talk page of the specific article. On another note, why don't you star your user page? The Ogre 05:26, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
- Mostly because of this: "Eventually Playboy decided to take the high road (providing more artfull nudity) while Penthouse and Hustler (even more so) decided to provide even more explicit images." I'm new to this; maybe I was going overboard with the tags. Do you think that one should be removed? Eloil 05:19, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Numismatics
Greetings!! I'd like to welcome you to WikiProject Numismatics. Anything you see that can be improved upon, go for it, anything that is lacking add it, anything that is all together absent, please fill us in. There are quite a few knowledgeable people of both numismatics and wikipedia, in this little project, so don't hesitate to ask. Please be sure to read through the whole of the project pages, as we have just recently started using some of them. Again, welcome.
- You can add this to your user page:
Which looks like so:
This user is a member of the Numismatics WikiProject, a WikiProject which aims to expand coverage of numismatics on Wikipedia. Please feel free to join. |
- Hope this gets you off and contributing to the little project that makes the world go round. If you need anything don't hesitate to ask either me, or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics. See ya :) Joe I 01:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:5-MeO-NMT (small).svg
Thanks for uploading Image:5-MeO-NMT (small).svg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Melatonin (small).svg
Thanks for uploading Image:Melatonin (small).svg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the images
I just wanted to say thank you for creating so many nice tryptamine images and adding to them to the tables in the article. --Ed (Edgar181) 17:10, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chemical images guidelines
Hi Eloil,
please have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Structure drawing. Would it be possible to change your image accordingly (i.e removing any text, use the same text size for all atoms), and to add the missing indole-H. Thanks, Cacycle 01:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Category Organophosphates
I have seen that you have added several compounds to the category:organophosphates. This name is highly ambiguous and usually refers to cholinergic poisons that do not even have to be phosphoric acid esters. What do you think about creating a new category named organic phosphates or phosphoric acid esters and moving the non-pesticides there. It would take some time to recategorize all the articles, but I think it would be worth the effort. Cacycle 13:27, 2 April 2007 (UTC)