User talk:El benito
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, El benito, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kukini 22:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Summaries
Hey, my favorite character lately has been Genis-vell so I've been updating a lot. I noticed you did a couple of basic changes (one was spelling, the other fixed a link). PLEASE give a quick summary when ya do a change, and tag it as a small fix if it's something like that. Otherwise I get nervous about my baby (even though I didn't write the article, lol). Thanks. --Torourkeus 21:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Randall McCloy
I know this out of left field, but you were involved with some discussion on this article and the guy who keeps inserting his "expert" testimony is back and I could use some help in responding to him. J Shultz 06:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Echoing
That's no problem at all. Err, I guess I think mine is more concise, but that's probably only because I wrote it. I'm certainly not about to delete anyone else's work. — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 16:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Crimson Dawn
- Because each article, ideally, should have references and in line citations so people know where the information came from. People won't assume that the article came from external links. It seems like a good article, but I am labelling it to be improved in that way. The more references, especially those cited in articles makes it better. :) Judgesurreal777 17:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Avengers members template
I'm not quite sure I understand what you're trying to say. Why would the names of the Avengers on the templates need changing? Kusonaga 00:19, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Tha's cool, no need to apologize. :) Kusonaga 10:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vibraxas
I still don't think there's a lot to say about Vibraxas or that he is a particularly notable character (besides Fantastic Force and the latter third of Christopher Priest's Black Panther, he's pretty much not done anything else in the Marvel Universe), but if you want to start the article, go ahead; it's up to you. I didn't "kill" any Vibraxas article; no article existed at the time, and I created a redirect, which is better than nothing at all. —Lowellian (reply) 06:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Skeets
Wow. Good catch on 52 Week Six. All of the arrows point at both Booster and Skeets. --Chris Griswold (☏) 18:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Note about wiki.png change
Hi, I was just taking a look at wiki.png and I noted that yours was the last edit of the file. I understand that you made some type of graphical change to it, but at the same time, the filesize just about doubled. It's still a relatively small file, and I'm sure that the picture itself is cached all over the internet, but it is on every page so it's bound to be downloaded an insane number of times. I've no clue as how to weigh aesthetics vs economics, especially given I don't know what the bandwidth issues are, but I thought I'd just bring this to your attention. Thanks! El benito 22:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hi El benito: don't worry, the image at Wiki.png is not enabled to be the sitewide logo. You need a developer to change the logo here. I asked Tim Starling about changing it, but he raised the same concern as you: file size. —Mets501 (talk) 22:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Heroes4hire.GIF)
Thanks for uploading Image:Heroes4hire.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)