User talk:Eklapper
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hey there ethan...what's up? Sorry I forgot BBTV...I knew I was missing something...Benje309 05:09, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] WRNN
"Give me critera for a real independent. WRNN has carriage in all five boroughs, and also in the Albany DMA! We have millions of viewers. Unless you cite your sources, I suggest RNN stay on that list! Do you work for WLNY or something?"
- First, WLIG/WLNY has had cable coverage in NYC for more than a decade. WRNN got theirs only within the last three to four years.
- Second, carriage in the A/S/T market means NOTHING in NYC. IMO, WRNN should have targeted itself towards the Capital Region from jumpstreet.
- And lastly, when I revised this article, my main criteria for stations being on the list was that they fit the programming description written in the main section. Please tell me, what makes WRNN a "notable" independent when the only original programming on the station is that 2.5 hour block of newscasts, and those two-minute top-of-the-hour updates? The rest of the day is filled with infomercials, paid religion, home shopping, and lest we forget about those bargain-basement kids shows that fill the E/I requirements. No REAL syndicated shows, just cheap stuff to fill airtime and pay the bills. To me, that doesn't make WRNN a REAL independent.
- BTW, if you assume I'm affiliated with WLNY, is it safe to say you are linked with WRNN? Rollosmokes 06:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Connorsrnn.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Connorsrnn.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
 |
The Original Barnstar | |
| For your hard work and dedication to improving Wikipedia, I, Sharkface217, hereby award you this Original Barnstar. Good job! Sharkface217 19:51, 4 November 2006 (UTC) |
- You're quite welcome. Sharkface217 22:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Aumark.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Aumark.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
