User talk:Edward Bower

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Edward Bower, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Thanks for archiving Talk:Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. In the future, to avoid potential misunderstandings, it's a good idea to use an edit summary when archiving a talk page, in addition to posting a comment on that page as you did.

Again, welcome!  --Ginkgo100talk 21:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] restoration of text in Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

With regards to the re-addition of the large section of text. I am posting my reply here too because sometimes I forget to look back at the talk page for replies...

I think the stuff you re-added detracts from the value, I dont think it's should be here, What do you think the importance of it is?Edward Bower 03:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
My primary concern was that I just noticed that it was deleted all of a sudden for a reason I couldn't determine, so I fixed it. In terms of relevancy while a lot of it seems to be very drug specific and kind of nitty gritty, some of it is definitely important and should be kept for sure. ADHD coaching, questions about metabolism in people with and without ADHD, and widely used alternative treatments for example. Personally, I think people should go though the treatment section for relevancy piece by piece rather than mass delete it. Perhaps to cut down on all the drug specific bits, a separate article on treatments for ADHD could be created. Or it could be deleted. I just want to reach a consensus. Sifaka talk 03:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)