Education Act 1918

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Acts of Parliament of predecessor
states to the United Kingdom
Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of England to 1601
Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of England to 1659
Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of England to 1699
Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of England to 1706
Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of Scotland
Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of Ireland
Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom
1707–1719 | 1720–1739 | 1740–1759 | 1760–1779
1780–1800 | 1801–1819 | 1820–1839 | 1840–1859
1860–1879 | 1880–1899 | 1900–1919 | 1920–1939
1940–1959 | 1960–1979 | 1980–1999 | 2000–Present
Acts of the Scottish Parliament
Acts of the Northern Ireland Parliament
Acts of the Northern Ireland Assembly
Orders in Council for Northern Ireland
United Kingdom Statutory Instruments

Education Act 1918, often known as the Fisher Act, is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom (8 & 9 Geo. V c. 39). It was drawn up by Herbert Fisher.

This raised the school leaving age to fourteen and planned to expand tertiary education. Other features of the 1918 Education Act included the provision of ancillary services (medical inspection, nursery schools, centres for pupils with special needs, etc).[1]

By the 1920s, the education of young children was of growing interest and concern to politicians, as well as to educationalists. As a result of this rising level of public debate, the Government of the day created a series of commissions of enquiry, headed by Hadow. Altogether the Hadow Committee published three very important reports - 1926, 1931 and 1933.

These reports led to major changes in the structure of primary education. In particular, they resulted in separate and distinctive educational practise for children aged 5-7 (infants) and those aged 7-11 (juniors).

The Reports recommended child centred approaches and class sizes of no more than thirty. These recommendations marked a triumph of 'progressive' educational thought and practise over the more 'traditional' ideas and proved to be popular with many policy makers and teachers alike.