Talk:Edsel Dope

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]
Copyright The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from {{{source}}}. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to license this material under the GNU Free Documentation License, and evidence of this has been lodged with the Wikimedia PR department, under OTRS ticket number {{{otrs}}}.

This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia Open Ticket Request System (OTRS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en at wikimedia dot org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

Your site states that the information that I posted in the entry for Edsel Dope is a copyright infringement from the website http://www.edseldope.com/edselbio.html. But, *I* own www.edseldope.com . . . I own the domain name, I own, or use with Dope's permission, everything on the site. I design, maintain, edit and update the website. How do I go about having this information removed from your copyright infringement list?


Roxanne West

~RoXXXy Dope~

webmaster: www.edseldope.com


[edit] NPOV

"Dope is essentially Edsel's band, and although some of his choices may not always meet the approval of his fans, he still deserves credit for keeping dope a force to be reckoned with, through its many trials and tribulations" is a statement of questionable neutrality. Would something along the lines of "Dope is essentially Edsel's band, and although some of his choices may not always meet the approval of his fans, he has still managed to keep Dope active, through its many trials and tribulations" possibly be more appropriate?

TheDecayTheyFear 08:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)