Wikipedia:Editor review/SunStar Net 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User:SunStar Net

SunStar Net (talk • contribs) My last editor review was very helpful: this time I am looking for advice for requests for adminship: if anyone wants to nominate me when they think it is appropriate to do so, then feel free! --SunStar Nettalk 17:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC) SunStar Nettalk 17:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Reviews

  • Hello. You are doing a good job, but I wouldn't attempt an RfA just now. You have some pros (such as edit summary use, good participation in XfD), but also some cons: 1) Your edit count is still too low. I do not recommend an RfA with less than 3000 edits on Wikipedia, 1000 of which on the mainspace, and a few hundreds on Wikipedia space (I suggest +4000 edits actually). 2) Your account is less than 2 months old, I do not recommend an RfA before 3 months (and suggest +4 months). 3) I see that you've been reporting users to WP:AIV on the grounds of inappropriate username. Although that's a big plus, I'd like to see you fight some vandalism (I see no recent vandal fight). You're on the right path but an RfA as of this time is way too premature. Wait a couple more months, join the vandalfighters and I'd be glad to nominate you when the right time has come. By the way, you should answer to the questions below. Best regards.--Húsönd 03:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Hey SunStar, you are doing excellent job here on Wikipedia, but I'm afraid I'm going to have to agree with Husond about a few issues. Your edit count is close but is lower than 2000 edits, while it is the minimum edit count required for a successful RfA, I suggest waiting until about 6000 edits. You might want to take a look at the Image:SuccessRatevsEditsatRfA.png to see how it might effect your chances. I see a lot of participation in the Wikipedia namespace, which is excellent, but over 1000 Wikipedia namespace edits are also advised. For vandalism reverting, I suggest using an automated program, such as VandalProof. I'm a bit worried about your recently uploaded images of cars though, these show a lack of knowledge about Wikipedia's fair use policy because these can be replaced with freely-licensed photos. You should add a fair use rationale to each fair use image you upload and explain their source as well. Well that's it I guess, take a good heed of my advices and apply for adminship in 4 months or so, I am sure you will succeed. Michaelas10 (Talk) 16:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I think you are trying to earn edits so you don't get booted off by deleting articles that have been cited. I have seen at least 5 articles with reliable sources having you behind the deletion process. You are disgrace to wikipedia. I have 2 other account names that have over 4700 edits each and I have never had to delete a page. Congrats for screwing up this site.~Protester 101

  • I've seen you around doing a lot of good work, but haven't taken a close look: my general impression is good. My comment here is mainly a response to the note you left at AN/I, and the shrill comment above by an obvious sockpuppet. The above comment is a perfect example of what will happen to you all the time if you are an admin, and if you are doing your job right. You couldn't have asked for a better example. This comes with the buttons, and you will have to get used to it. How you handle it is critical. You don't have to tolerate it; you can revert and block these people when they are vandals or obvious sockpuppets of banned users, but you have to cultivate an indifference to personal attacks and what often feels like unfair criticism, else you will burn out fast; and you seek out help in bad or ambiguous cases. Hope this helps! Antandrus (talk) 02:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Why did you delete the page i created? I added 2 cites and was going to add another. I was taught in PAP English in high school that when creating a research paper you had to have at least 3 sources and works cited. I was going to add that until you deleted it. I agree with Protester on his comments maybe not the irrational ones but the deletion part, yes. I met that kid at a show he was in and he touched my life and inspired me and you deleted the page on him. I'm livid with you SunStar. I won't give up because of you. I'll give that kid the honor he deserves and needs. You welcomed me and said nothing about deleting an honorable innocent good kids page I spent my time creating. I respect your time spent on here but don't approve of your action. Thanks again. ~S.S.

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    Answer
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    Answer
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../e/d/i/Wikipedia%7EEditor_review_SunStar_Net_2_fbf0.html"