Wikipedia:Editor review/Quatreryukami
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] quatreryukami
quatreryukami (talk • contribs) As I eventually hope to accend to admin status (having previously failed) I would like input on how I can better help Wikipedia. I will be using this review to improve to hopefully just a well known user, and a good editor. I know my edits are not very big, and I don't have many, but I would like to know what others think Quatreryukami 01:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
- Hi! I noticed that you editing really seemed to pick up since February and you're off to a good start!
-
- You have tried contributing to not only the mainspace, but also the talk namespace and project namespace which is good (I hope that that wasn't biased from my metapedianist nature).
- You had an RfA a while back which failed and I recommend that you do not try again until you have spent more time with the project and are ready.
- I noticed that you are a part of WikiProject MMO which was a good move on your part as it is the best WikiProject ever (I hope that wasn't biased from the fact that I created the project). I do recommend that you work with one or more WikiProjects, even if not WikiProject MMO.
- Like I said before, you're off to a good start and good luck for the future! Greeves (talk • contribs) 23:44, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
- View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- All of my edits I am pleased with, but I am particularly proud of my edits to Rakion and I am currently working on GI Online which, as you can see, needs lots of love.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Maybe; I have debated, but never got in a edit war ( I always take steps to avoid it) and I tend to look for general consensus in arguements, before I even post. I hope to continue doing the same.
- Optional Question from Greeves: You said that you are currently working on GI Online, but it's a red link. What happened there?
