User talk:Ecki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your creation of the article, Nuclear policy, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved. Happy editing! htonl 18:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:BombCasings742c10.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BombCasings742c10.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your only warning: Please do not add obscenities to Wikipedia, like you did in Kristy Morgan. Injecting obscene pictures to articles or user pages offends many people. Wikipedia treats such actions as vandalism and blocks people from editing for such repeated vandalism. -- P.B. Pilhet 22:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC), Counter-Vandalism Unit

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:KristyMorgan.jpg

 (aeropagitica)   (talk)  22:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:JenniferTorant.jpg

 (aeropagitica)   (talk)  22:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:AdriannaKroplewska.jpg

 (aeropagitica)   (talk)  22:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:RitaGranberry.jpg

 (aeropagitica)   (talk)  22:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:BarbieMurdock.jpg

 (aeropagitica)   (talk)  22:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:TiffanySterling.jpg

 (aeropagitica)   (talk)  22:07, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Playboy models of the day

Hi, I just wanted to give you a heads up that I have listed all of the articles on Playboy models of the day for deletion, because you haven't written anything which indicates their notability. If they are noted for anything other than having been chosen one of 365 modesl of the day, then please indicate on the article pages. Also, your use of the Playboy centerfold infobox is inappropriate, because they aren't centerfolds. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Citing sources

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you added new information to Me & U — we thank you for doing so, but in order to satisfy our verifiability policy policy, we need to know from which sources you got that information. Just adding a link to the article next to your addition would be all right, or you could put it in the article's discussion page. If you need any help, feel free to ask me at my talk page. Thanks! Extraordinary Machine 18:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Avian flu

Thanks for trying to help at avian flu but the minor details about one country's laws coping with this world wide problem are not appropriate for the avian flu article. A seperate article on Hungary and H5N1 could be done as someone tried to do for India. WAS 4.250 22:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright violation

Please do not post copyrighted material on Wikipedia, as you did with Saul Landau and http://www.counterpunch.org/landau08292006.html. It is a violation of Wikipedia policy and United States law.--Curtis Clark 16:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please avoid copyright issues

Although using sections from references may seem a good idea, it is not. Direct usage without clearly stating that it is from another author is plagarism and a copyright violation. Fair use covers quotes and incidental use, not insertion as your own material as this appears to be. LinaMishima 20:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

If you do not stop posting copyrighted material, as you did on George W. Bush's second term as President of the United States, you will be blocked. Please only contribute original material. Thanks. ~MDD4696 18:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:BloodDiamond.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BloodDiamond.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nilfanion (talk) 22:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tiffany Sterling

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Tiffany Sterling, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cmichael 03:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)