Dyson sphere

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
A cut-away diagram of an idealized Dyson shell—a variant on Dyson's original concept—1 AU in radius.
A cut-away diagram of an idealized Dyson shell—a variant on Dyson's original concept—1 AU in radius.

A Dyson sphere (or shell as it appeared in the original paper) is a hypothetical megastructure that was originally described by Freeman Dyson as a system of orbiting solar power satellites meant to completely encompass a star and capture its entire energy output. Dyson speculated that such structures would be the logical consequence of the long-term survival of technological civilizations, and proposed that searching for evidence of the existence of such structures might lead to the detection of advanced intelligent extraterrestrial life.

Since then, other variant designs involving building an artificial structure — or a series of structures — to encompass a star have been proposed in exploratory engineering or described in science fiction under the name Dyson sphere. Most fictional depictions of a Dyson sphere describe a solid shell of matter enclosing a star (see diagram at right), which is considered the least plausible variant of the idea.

While it is believed that some of these design variants are impractical, if not physically impossible, some designs do not require any major breakthroughs in our basic scientific understanding for their construction — even though the technological abilities and industrial resources required are well beyond our current civilization.

Contents

[edit] Origin of concept

The concept of the Dyson sphere was the result of a thought experiment by physicist and mathematician Freeman Dyson, where he noted that every human technological civilization has constantly increased its demand for energy. He reasoned that if human civilization were to survive long enough, there would come a time when it required the total energy output of the sun. Thus, he proposed a system of orbiting structures designed to intercept and collect all energy produced by the sun. Dyson's proposal did not detail how such a system would be constructed, but focused only on issues of energy collection[1].

Dyson is credited with being the first to formalize the concept of the Dyson sphere in his 1959 paper "Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infra-Red Radiation", published in the journal Science. However, Dyson was inspired by the mention of the concept in the 1937 science fiction novel Star Maker, by Olaf Stapledon, and possibly by the works of J. D. Bernal and Raymond Z. Gallun who seem to have explored similar concepts in their work.[2]

[edit] Dyson spheres and SETI

In Dyson's original paper, he speculated that sufficiently advanced extraterrestrial civilizations would likely follow a similar power consumption pattern as humans, and would eventually build their own sphere of collectors. Constructing such a system would make such a civilization a Type II Kardashev civilization.[3]

The existence of such a system of collectors would alter the light emitted from the star system. Collectors would absorb, and re-radiate, energy from the star. The wavelength(s) of radiation emitted by the collectors would be determined by the emission spectra of the substances making them up, and the temperature of the collectors. Since it seems most likely that these collectors would be made up of heavy elements not normally found in the emission spectra of their central star — or at least not radiating light at such relatively "low" energies as compared to that which they would be emitting as energetic free nuclei in the stellar atmosphere — there would be atypical wavelengths of light for the star's spectral type in the light spectrum emitted by the star system. If the percentage of the star's output thus filtered or transformed by this absorption and re-radiation was significant, it could be detected at interstellar distances.

Given the amount of energy available per square meter at a distance of 1 AU from the Sun, it is possible to calculate that most known substances would be re-radiating energy in the infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum. Thus, a Dyson Sphere, constructed by life forms not dissimilar to humans, who dwelled in proximity to a Sun like star, made with materials similar to those available to humans, would most likely cause an increase in the amount of infrared radiation in the star system's emitted spectrum. Hence, Dyson selected the title "Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infrared Radiation" for his published paper.

SETI has adopted these assumptions in their search, looking for such "infrared heavy" spectra from solar analogs. As of 2005 Fermilab has an ongoing survey for such spectra by analyzing data from the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS).[4]

[edit] Dyson spheres in fiction

Main article: Dyson spheres in fiction

As noted above, the Dyson sphere originated in fiction[5], and it is a concept that has appeared often in science fiction since then (see Dyson spheres in fiction for listed examples). In fictional accounts, the Dyson sphere concept is most often interpreted as an artificial hollow sphere of matter around a star (see diagram at top of page). This perception is a misinterpretation of Dyson's original concept. In response to letters prompted by his original paper, Dyson replied, "A solid shell or ring surrounding a star is mechanically impossible. The form of 'biosphere' which I envisaged consists of a loose collection or swarm of objects traveling on independent orbits around the star."[6]

More recently, the terms Dyson swarm and Dyson shell have come into use to make the distinction between Dyson's original concept and the popularized depiction of a solid shell.

[edit] Variants

There are several variants on Dyson's original concept that have been proposed over the years, which differ based on their composition and method of construction. While the most often depicted variant — the Dyson shell — is considered by many to be impractical or even impossible, other proposed design variants of the sphere based on orbiting satellites or solar sails do not require any major theoretical breakthroughs in our scientific understanding. However, such constructs are well beyond our present-day industrial capabilities, or those of the foreseeable future. It is also likely that there are unforeseen industrial scaling difficulties in such a construction project, and that our current understanding of industrial automation is insufficient to build the self-maintaining systems needed for the sphere's upkeep.

[edit] Dyson swarm

A Dyson Ring — the simplest form of the Dyson Swarm — to scale. Orbit is 1 AU in radius, collectors are 1.0×107 km in diameter (~25× the Earth-Moon distance), spaced 3 degrees from center to center around the orbital circle.
A Dyson Ring — the simplest form of the Dyson Swarm — to scale. Orbit is 1 AU in radius, collectors are 1.0×107 km in diameter (~25× the Earth-Moon distance), spaced 3 degrees from center to center around the orbital circle.
A relatively simple arrangement of multiple Dyson Rings of the type pictured above, to form a more complex Dyson Swarm. Rings' orbital radii are spaced 1.5×107 km with regards to one another, but average orbital radius is still 1 AU. Rings are rotated 15 degrees relative to one another, around a common axis of rotation.
A relatively simple arrangement of multiple Dyson Rings of the type pictured above, to form a more complex Dyson Swarm. Rings' orbital radii are spaced 1.5×107 km with regards to one another, but average orbital radius is still 1 AU. Rings are rotated 15 degrees relative to one another, around a common axis of rotation.

The variant closest to Dyson's original conception is the "Dyson swarm". It consists of a large number of independent constructs (usually solar power satellites and space habitats) orbiting in a dense formation around the star. This approach to the construction of a Dyson sphere has several advantages: the components making it up could range widely in individual size and design, and such a sphere could be constructed incrementally over a long period of time.

Such a swarm is not without drawbacks. The nature of orbital mechanics would make the arrangement of the orbits of the swarm extremely complex. The simplest such arrangement is the Dyson ring in which all such structures share the same orbit, although this pattern would intercept only a small percentage of the star's output. More complex orbital patterns add more rings, offset the "axis of rotation" of the rings' orbits with regards to one another, change the eccentricity of the orbits, and add rings at varying distances from the central star. More complex patterns with more rings would intercept more of the star's output, but would result in some constructs eclipsing others periodically when their orbits overlap. Another potential problem is the increasing loss of orbital stability as adding more orbiting constructs increases the probability of orbital perturbations of other constructs.

There is a definite trade-off between the complexity of the orbital formation and the efficiency of new collectors added to the sphere. As the number of collectors in the swarm increased, the net gain of collected energy per collector would decrease, as adding additional collectors increases the number of eclipses of one collector by another. It is likely there would come a point when the cost of building additional collectors would be deemed to not be worth the small gain in collected energy. Thus, it is unlikely that a Dyson swarm would be built that would completely engulf the star.

As noted above, such a cloud of collectors would alter the light emitted by the star system, but as can be seen here, it is unlikely that such an alteration would be complete, and that some of the star's natural light would still be present in the system's emitted spectrum.

[edit] Dyson shell

The variant of the Dyson sphere most often depicted in fiction is the "Dyson shell": a uniform solid shell of matter around the star (see diagram at top of page). Unlike the Dyson swarm, such a structure would completely alter the emissions of the central star, and would intercept 100% of the star's energy output. Such a structure would also provide an immense surface which many envision being used for habitation, if the surface could be made habitable.

There are several serious theoretical difficulties with the solid shell variant of the Dyson sphere.

  • Such a shell would have no net gravitational interaction with its englobed sun (see the divergence theorem applied to gravity), and could drift with regards to the central star. If such movements went uncorrected, they could eventually result in a collision between the sphere and the star — most likely with disastrous results. Such structures would need either some form of propulsion to counteract any drift, or some way to repel the surface of the sphere away from the star.
  • For the same reason, such a shell would have no net gravitational interaction with anything else inside it. The contents of any biosphere placed on the inner surface of a Dyson shell would not be attracted to the sphere's surface and would simply fall into the star. It has been proposed that a biosphere could be contained between two concentric spheres, or placed on the outside of the sphere where it would be held in place by the star's gravity. In such cases, some form of illumination would have to be devised, or the sphere made at least partly transparent, as the star's light would otherwise be completely hidden.
  • The compressive strength of the material forming the sphere would have to be immense. Any arbitrarily selected point on the surface of the sphere can be viewed as being under the pressure of the base of a dome 1 AU in height under the Sun's gravity at that distance. Indeed it can be viewed as being at the base of an infinite number of arbitrarily selected domes, but as much of the force from any one arbitrary dome is counteracted by those of another, the net force on that point is immense, but finite. No known or theorized material is strong enough to withstand this pressure, and form a rigid, static sphere around a star.[7] It has been proposed by Paul Birch[8] (in relation to smaller "Supra-Jupiter" constructions around a large planet rather than a star) that it may be possible to support a Dyson shell by dynamic means similar to those used in a space fountain. Masses travelling in circular tracks on the inside of the sphere, at velocities significantly greater than orbital velocity, would press outwards due to centrifugal force. For a Dyson shell of 1AU radius around a star with the same mass as the Sun, mass travelling ten times orbital velocity (300 km/s) would support nine times its own mass in additional shell structure. The arrangement of such tracks suffers from the same difficulties as arranging the orbits of a Dyson swarm, and it is unclear how much energy would be consumed ensuring the velocity of the masses was maintained.
  • There may not be sufficient building material in the Solar system to construct a Dyson shell. Dyson's original estimate was that there was enough material in the Solar system for a 1 AU shell 3 meters thick, but this included hydrogen and helium which are unlikely to be much use as building material. Anders Sandberg estimates that there is 1.82×1026 kg of usable building material in the Solar system, enough for a 1 AU shell with a surface density of 600 kg/m2—about 8–20 cm thick depending on the density of the material. This includes the cores of the gas giants, which may be hard to access; the inner planets alone provide only 11.79×1024 kg, enough for a 1 AU shell with a surface density of just 42 kg/m2.[9]

[edit] Dyson bubble

A Dyson Bubble: an arrangement of statites around a star, in a non-orbital pattern. Note: so long as a statite has an unobstructed line-of-sight to its star, it can hover at any point in space near its star. This relatively simple arrangement is only one of an infinite number of possible statite configurations, and is meant as a contrast for a Dyson Swarm only. Statites are pictured as the same size as the collectors pictured above, and arranged at a uniform 1 AU distance from the star.
A Dyson Bubble: an arrangement of statites around a star, in a non-orbital pattern. Note: so long as a statite has an unobstructed line-of-sight to its star, it can hover at any point in space near its star. This relatively simple arrangement is only one of an infinite number of possible statite configurations, and is meant as a contrast for a Dyson Swarm only. Statites are pictured as the same size as the collectors pictured above, and arranged at a uniform 1 AU distance from the star.

A third type of Dyson sphere is the "Dyson bubble". It would be similar to a Dyson swarm, composed of many independent constructs (usually solar power satellites and space habitats) and likewise could be constructed incrementally.

Unlike the Dyson swarm, the constructs making it up are not in orbit around the star, but would be statites—satellites suspended by use of enormous light sails using radiation pressure to counteract the star's pull of gravity. Such constructs would not be in danger of collision or of eclipsing one another; they would be totally stationary with regard to the star, and independent of one another. As the ratio of radiation pressure and the force of gravity from a star are constant regardless of the distance (provided the statite has an unobstructed line-of-sight to the surface of its star[10]), such statites could also vary their distance from their central star.

The practicality of this approach is questionable with modern material science, but cannot yet be ruled out. A statite deployed around our own sun would have to have an overall density of 0.78 grams per square meter of sail.[11] To illustrate the low mass of the required materials, consider that the total mass of a bubble of such material 1 AU in radius would be about 2.17×1020 kg, which is about the same mass as the asteroid Pallas.[9]

Such a material is currently beyond our ability to produce; the lightest carbon-fiber light sail material currently produced has a density — without payload — of 3g/m2, or about 5 times heavier than would be needed to construct a solar statite.[12]

However, there has been some speculation about the creation of ultra light Carbon nanotube meshes through molecular manufacturing techniques whose density would be below 0.1g/m2.[13] If production of such materials on an industrial scale is feasible, and such materials could be used in light sails, the average sail density with rigging might be kept to 0.3g/m2 (a "spin stabilized" light sail requires minimal additional mass in rigging). If such a sail could be constructed at this areal density, a space habitat the size of the L5 Society's proposed O'Neill cylinder (500 km², with room for over 1 million inhabitants, massing 3×106 tons[14]) could be supported by a circular light sail 3,000 km in diameter, with a combined sail/habitat mass of 5.4×109kg. For comparison, this is just slightly smaller than the diameter of Jupiter's moon Europa (although the sail is a flat disc, not a sphere), or the distance between San Francisco and Kansas City. Such a structure would, however, have a mass quite a lot less than many asteroids. While the construction of such a massive inhabitable statite would be a gigantic undertaking, and the required material science behind it is as yet uncertain, its technical challenges are slight compared to other engineering feats and required materials proposed in other Dyson sphere variants.

[edit] Other types

  • Another possibility is the "Dyson net", a web of cables strung about the star which could have power or heat collection units strung between the cables, like the one used in the book Star Trek: Voyager—The Final Fury. The Dyson net reduces to a special case of Dyson shell or bubble, however, depending on how the cables are supported against the sun's gravity.
  • The Ringworld, or Niven ring, could be considered a particular kind of Dyson sphere. Larry Niven, who first developed the concept, described it as "an intermediate step between Dyson Spheres and planets"[15]. The ringworld could perhaps be described as a slice of a Dyson Sphere (taken through its equator), spun for artificial gravity, and used mainly for habitation as opposed to energy collection.
  • Stellar engines are a class of hypothetical megastructures, whose purpose is to extract useful energy from a star, sometimes for specific purposes. For example, Matrioshka brains extract energy for purposes of computation; Shkadov thrusters extract energy for purposes of propulsion. Some of the proposed stellar engine designs are based on the Dyson sphere.

[edit] References

  1. ^ Freemann J. Dyson (1960). "Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infra-Red Radiation". Science 131: 1667–1668. DOI:10.1126/science.131.3414.1667. .
  2. ^ Dyson FAQ: Was Dyson First?. Retrieved on September 1, 2006.
  3. ^ Kardashev, Nikolai. "On the Inevitability and the Possible Structures of Supercivilizations", The search for extraterrestrial life: Recent developments; Proceedings of the Symposium, Boston, MA, June 18-21, 1984 (A86-38126 17-88). Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1985, p. 497-504.
  4. ^ Carrigan, D. (2006). Fermilab Dyson Sphere search program. Retrieved on March 2, 2006.
  5. ^ Olaf Stapledon. Star Maker; J. D. Bernal, "The World, the Flesh, and the Devil"
  6. ^ F. J. Dyson, J. Maddox, P. Anderson, E. A. Sloane (1960). "Letters and Response, Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infrared Radiation". Science 132: 250–253. DOI:10.1126/science.132.3421.252-a. 
  7. ^ Dyson FAQ: How strong does a rigid Dyson shell need to be?. Retrieved on March 8, 2006.
  8. ^ Supramundane Planets (ZIP). Retrieved on March 2, 2006.
  9. ^ a b Sandberg, Anders. Is there enough matter in the solar system to build a Dyson shell?. Dyson Sphere FAQ. Retrieved on August 13, 2006.
  10. ^ Sunlight Exerts Pressure. Retrieved on March 2, 2006.
  11. ^ Dyson Sphere FAQ. Retrieved on March 8, 2006.
  12. ^ Clark, Greg (2000). SPACE.com Exclusive: Breakthrough In Solar Sail Technology. Space.com. Retrieved on March 2, 2006.
  13. ^ Researchers produce strong, transparent carbon nanotube sheets. PhysOrg.com (2005). Retrieved on March 2, 2006.
  14. ^ Dinkin, Sam (2006). The Space Review: The high risk frontier. Thespacereview.com. Retrieved on March 18, 2006.
  15. ^ Larry Niven. "Bigger than Worlds", Analog, March 1974.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../d/y/s/Dyson_sphere.html"