User talk:Duece22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Duece22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Infrogmation 22:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] New Orleans, Louisiana

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. Please provide sources for the numbers you are adding to the New Orleans, Louisiana article. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. User:Zoe|(talk) 20:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original .content is considered vandalism and may result in a block. --ElKevbo 16:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding that the New Orleans population counts "will be met with criticism" and "will be seen as unstable and unreliable". This is blatantly POV. The article already says—twice—that the numbers are only unofficial estimates. I think that's plenty, and from the looks of the history page, I'm not the only one. If you can cite a source for your statement, that's a different matter. -Babomb 01:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Again, please stop adding this. I don't know why you're so adamant about this particular claim, but it's going to keep getting deleted unless you can cite a source for it. Wikipedia has a policy of No original research. -Babomb 11:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Please keep from adding excessive and unsourced statements. Your edit to the nickname "Hollywood South" is already stated later in the article, as is your edit to the population statement in the beginning. These introductory parts are meant to be a brief overview, with details later in the appropriate parts of the article. --Bobster687 03:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Bobster687 01:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


I'm not quite sure why you're so adamant about your edits to the article, but the population and Angelina/Brad information is already available later in the article. This introductory part shouldn't be too detailed. I am only deleting the information in the beginning to keep the article concise, as the article is already too long. I would like to delete this excess information, if you would allow me to do so. Doing this, I feel, helps the article to better meet wikipedia's standards. Thanks. --Bobster687 17:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kobe Bryant

You are putting too much detail into the lead section of the Kobe Bryant article. The lead section is just a brief overview of what makes the subject notable. Please see WP:LEAD. Thanks! Mwelch 22:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Concur. Please stop adding this content to the lead, it has been reverted a number of times already. Your edits further suggest that you are not familiar with Wiki markup (in particular the [[article|alt-name]] syntax). Please discuss your changes on Talk:Kobe Bryant first. Simishag 23:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Reopening" sections on New Orleans-related pages

Your "Reopening" section edits to Lafitte Projects, Calliope Projects, Magnolia Projects and related pages are repetitive, as the sections are almost identical across all of the pages. I'll assume good faith here but some might see this as vandalism. More importantly, since the content is duplicated rather than linked, it's unlikely to be updated in every place at once. A single article on reopening, linked in to each page, would be more appropriate. Simishag 23:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New Orleans, Louisiana

Please check this. Thank you. -- ReyBrujo 02:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in New Orleans, Louisiana. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- ReyBrujo 02:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../d/u/e/User_talk%7EDuece22_0c07.html"