User talk:Dspart
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Well?
Go on then, write something. Yes YOU!
[edit] Your edits to Tlaloc and Aztec codices
I have reverted three of your edits that inserted unsourced information of little or no relevance to the articles topic.Inserting irrelevant unsourced material into articles is considered vandalism and may lead to offenders being blocked. If you feel that your additions have been wrongfully removed please state you reasons for including them at the relevant discussion pages. ·Maunus· ·ƛ· 11:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] too long
It is felt by a number of editors that Longest Possible Story was nonsense. The least I will say is that it was unreferenced and therefore very dubious. If you really can justify this as a sensible concept which is not original research, raise the matter at WP:DRV. -- RHaworth 08:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Longest Possible Story
Now, I'm no scientist... but I have to agree that said article seemed of little importance to an encyclopedia. Downy 08:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Follow-up: Well, to point it out, it was the end that tipped it over. You linked stuff like 'bed' to 'The Matrix' and stuff.
Sorry, this is wrong??? It's true - and remember the reference section is a Non-canonical *example* - I am going back to bed, the exception_handler(0.) is in 'The Matrix' (e.g., The Architect scenes). What's the other stuff? - 0.
[edit] Block
I have blocked you for a few days because all you seem to be doing is writing nonsense on your user page. It is the verbal equivalent of doodling and is not what your user page is meant for. Please find somewhere else to scribble. -- RHaworth 01:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
