Talk:DROD Elements

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	CVG Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
CVG To-do: edit  Gaming Collaboration of the week: Baldur's Gate series Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks Merge: Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)

[edit] Proposed Deletion of DROD Monsters

Prod was contested; here's the discussion from my talk page: Marasmusine 07:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Please help me understand how it falls under WP:NOT when it's actually just an extension of the original article. It might seem that what you really meant is that it shouldn't have been categorized under Video Games, which causes it to appear on various lists. The design decision for separating the list from the main article stems from following the pattern of Doom article. Consult List_of_enemies_in_Doom. I'm not a policy man, so please explain it to me in small words. Maurog 04:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Maurog, thanks for replying. I feel the two articles are borderline 'game guide', are unreferenced, and have no notability on their own. List_of_enemies_in_Doom isn't a brilliant article but such a page can be justified because the enemies themselves are referenced in popular culture (due to the high notability of the game.)

If you still disagree, feel free to remove the prod tag. I'll see how the pages develop then in a few weeks possibly take them to articles for discussion if I feel the same way. Thanks, Marasmusine 07:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree that they have no notability on their own, because they are inseparable part of the original article. You cannot apply 'game guide' policy - if you check the articles in question, you will see that they "present facts, not teach a subject matter" and don't "include instructions or advice, suggestions, or contain 'how-to's". As for references, please add the appropriate tags where references are needed and they will be provided. I will remove the prod tags for now, but add a copy of this dialogue to discussion pages of both articles. Maurog 07:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)