User talk:Drfool

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Image Tagging Image:Infinityplusone.JPG 2 No non-notables, please 3 Do not add nonsense or nonnotables please 4 Clarification

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Infinityplusone.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Infinityplusone.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. lightdarkness ^(talk) 03:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No non-notables, please

A tag has been placed on your article The Maifesto, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why The Maifesto is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:The Maifesto. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. -- Ifnord 21:05, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Do not add nonsense or nonnotables please

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Eagle^talk 22:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

== Please unblock =="{{unblock}}

{{unblock}} I have been blocked for contributing "non-notables", and the block is "infinite"

I haven't done any severe vandalisms of existing pages or posted any offesnsive articles to warrant an infinte block, and I have made some valid contributions to some existing articles

I would appreciate it if I were unblocked, and I'm sure that I will make more valid contributions that would make unblocking me worthwhile.

Thank you for your consideration.

You made about 4 minor edits, then you made personal attacks on a respected member of the community, and then vandalized his user page. This block has nothing to do with the articles you submitted, it has to do with your attacks on another member. Unblock denied. If you want to make constructive edits, create a new account. --Rory096 04:14, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

I did not vandalize his page, but I was annoyed at hima and posted somehtign on his talk pageDrfool 04:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC) and those attacks where not profane or suggestive or innapropriate, i simply stated my discontent, and you can go and check that Drfool 04:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

You vandalized his page here. I never said the attacks were profane or suggestive, but they were inappropriate per WP:NPA. --Rory096 06:31, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia is about the spread of knowledge, not the persecution of members who disagree with the actions of others. The whole basis of knowledge is on the premise of disagreement, disagreement is the driving force that has motivated our society to advance to its current state of vast technological achievement, Had everyone conformed and no one had any disagreements, such improvements in society wouldn't have occurred. To block me based on my disagreements with Geogre, would be to demote Wikipedia's agenda! Drfool 05:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Disagreeing with someone doesn't mean you attack them and vandalize their user page. --Rory096 06:31, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Clarification

I didnt "attack" geogre, I left him a message, that is still there visible to read, and I didn't vandalise his page either Drfool 02:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

I would call putting a {{db-repost}} on someone's talk page "an attack".Eli Falk 13:27, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

I would hardly call that an attack, or vandalism, that is easily deleted with two clicks of the mouse and isnt all that offensive, had I done some heavy or irreversible vandalism, I would agree with this block

How is vandalism that is easy to revert not vandalism, it is still an attack and is still vandalism. There is no such thing as "good" vandalism -- Tawker 23:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Your making the wrong decision by not unblocking me "{{unblock}}" Drfool 22:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Of course it can be deleted with two clicks of the mouse, any vandalism can, that doesn't mean it's not vandalism. And not only did you add the {{db-repost}} tag to his userpage, you also called him a "sommunist" [sic] on your own. --Rory096 22:23, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

a sommunist is a work I invented for one who sleeps too much, a "som-unist"

I admit, doing the repost tag wasn't the smartest thing to do, but at that time he was really makign me angry by doing the repost tag on the articles I was making, so I sortof did it as a sort of revenge

But upon reflecting on the events that took place, my articles did deserve to be deleted and he had every right to delete them, and I was a bit out of line posting the tag on his page

Drfool 22:34, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Unblock tag removed, I'm assuming good faith and unblocking. However, be aware that in the future you may be reblocked indef without shorter blocks due to this history. NSLE _(T+C)^{(seen this?)} at 08:53 UTC (2006-04-11)