User talk:Don Black

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

{{unblock}}

Please don't block this IP address- it is a school, so one person may vandalise in a minor way, but many others are good, sensible Wikipedians. Is it possible to block usernames, not the IP address? See 'Please Don't Block This IP Address' in the menu. Thank You. My IP address is 212.219.82.37. Cheers.

The vandalism edits are coming from the IP address, not registered users, so its the IP address that is getting blocked. We can't do anything about the autoblocks that result, perhaps you should contact the person in charge of IT at this school and ask them to monitor their users so they don't vandalise.pschemp | talk 03:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia, James

Also, if you look towards the top of your page, you will find that you can view a page's discussion or edit history, edit it or add it to your watchlist, or look at your user page, talk page, preferences, watchlist of contributions list.

Good look in the Wikipedia world - Mollsmolyneux 13:52, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Here are some useful links to get you started:

[edit] There are plenty of other users from archie

Feel free to ask for help our talk pages:

Morning game geek i think i speak for us all when i ask when will the new balamory puzzle xbox game will be out

--The Adventures Of Oscar Sydney Polwitch 12:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 8

A tag has been placed on DJ Professor K , requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why DJ Professor K is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:DJ Professor K . Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. --mtz206 (talk) 13:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Professor K , requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Professor K is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Professor K . Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. --mtz206 (talk) 13:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Notability

Hi. You might noticed that the majority of pages you have added today are being tagged for speedy deletion because they do not present why the subject is notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Remember, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not an indiscriminate collection of information. Please familiarize yourself with these pages in order to create articles with better chances of remaining on the site: WP:N, WP:BIO & WP:MUSIC. Cheers. --mtz206 (talk) 13:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Test edits

Hi, I've just removed some of the test edits from your user talk page. Not only does it clean your page up, it also helps us identify other user tests or vandalism. -- Francs2000 19:12, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You seem awfully familiar ...

Manwaring? I think it might be you... and if it's not, then I don't exist.

[edit] Hello Devi

What is your username? (So you do exist)

[edit] Don't Block This IP Address

The IP address I use is one used by a whole school. There may be some stupid vandals, slightly changing and de-facing articles, but the majority of the Wikipedians on this IP address are doing good edits and doing a service to Wikipedia. I understand that you would not have known this, so please don't take it as a personnal attack (Can't Sleep, Clown Will Eat Me), but in future, please refrain from blocking this address. I'm not asking for a license to vandalise or anything, but purely from the point of view of the good Wikipedians on this IP Address.

[edit] Thank You

For unblocking me, I'm going to write some great articles now.

[edit] Guess What

The schools IP address is blocked again, so it's another week of non-editing. Great (that was sarcasm). Please unblock me admin.

[edit] But I don't...

Silly woman. I don't exist! I am but a figment of your over-active imagination...

[edit] Shut Up Devi

Stupid man. If you agree that you are pure nothingness, then so be it. But I have simple question- if you are nothing, then how did you write this? Ahhh. Gotchya there sucker.

[edit] You Butt-munch

Whenever did I agree that I was pure nothingness? You, my dear innocent fool, think too much. You don't want to fry your last remaining three brain cells with the supreme effort.
Simple question? Simple questions for simple people...
And as for the 'question' - I already stated that I was a figment. Meaning that I don't exist. Meaning that you made me up.
Touché.

[edit] That isn't an arguement

You simply wrote a load of bollocks, and wrote it intelligently as to make it seem meaningful. As for the question, it was for you, so yes, simple questions for simple people. Finally, touché, that's french. Yes, I do use ciao, but Italian is soooo much cooler than French, so I win. THE END.

P.S. Figment? What kind of an arguement is that? I mean really- that's just a big pile of ****. It really is.

[edit] The sequel

How was my argument, as you so eloquently put it 'bollocks'? You state the fact, but don't justify the answer.
'Wrote it intelligently' - I see that you acknowledge the fact that I am intelligent. So how can you call my good self a 'simple' person?
Bwahaha. I laugh at your foolish thong-wearing self. You can't even spell argument, for Hell's sake.
Well done for recognising a simple French word.
Bite me, thong-boy!

[edit] I would quite happily bite you

- Yet again, the intelligent use of language (not intelligence of author) to convey no real point as a structured argument. What's the thong-boy all about? I assume you mean the simple Man-Wearing-A-Thong-Joke. Wow you're so great at these arguments I am in awe. Hmmmm. Anyway, now I've won the argument I'd be quite happy to bite you. Bring it on. Do your worst. +


[edit] Hi from Geljamin

Hi Don Black, I'm sorry I was so slow in responding to your message, the answer to your original question is yes.

[edit] Thanks Geljamin

[edit] Pffft. Like you'd ever bite me!

If, as you say, you have 'won the argument', why are you prompting me to do my worst? You strange and peculiar child.
I may just choose to ignore you now. Or wait for a slightly more challenging argument to implement itself (I thought that I would give you something 'simple' to start off with).
And about the biting... 'Anyway, now I've won the argument I'd be quite happy to bite you'. That is a rather disturbing sentance.

[edit] Pathetic

a)The English master, as he seems to think he is, spelt sentence wrongly. (I don't care if I spell words incorrectly, but it's rich when the person who pulls me up for grammar and spelling cannot spell even the simple word 'sentence' correctly)

b) When I wrote, do your worst, I was not refering to this arguement, but in the real, non-ethernet world.

c)As I stated previously, I have already won this arguement, so how exactly do you think you won??? Explain, if you can (I assume you can't).

d)You call me a child, as I am, but I'm older than you; sure, it may be by a few days- but I'm still older. Ha.

e)Don't patronise one whom's own intelligence outways that of yourself. (I'm refering to the 'simple' remark.)

f)I've kept this arguement clean and inoffensive, you however, have no dignity and lack self restraint in the 'crudeness' department. So now, try and come back. I throw you the guantlet. Prepare for a metaphorical duel.

[edit] Hypocrite

You can't spell argument, even after I have told you that you have spelt it wrong. Moron. And what's a 'guantlet' anyways? I know what a 'gauntlet' is. Not a 'guantlet' though.
I call you a child, knowing that you are a child. I am also aware of the fact that I am I child. So what's your point with the statement that you're older than me? What on Earth does that prove?
'Clean and inoffensive'? What part of 'bollocks' or '****' is clean? And calling me 'sucker' or 'stupid'... I consider that offensive.
You think that you have won this argument. I do not think that you have won this argument. Obviously we are at a stalemate.
Your intelligence surpasses my own? Heh heh. You amuse me so with your naivety.And never 'assume' - it makes an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me' (well, not me personally).
Ooh... and furthermore... I have a link for you :- http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1027927.ece
I'll throw back this 'guantlet' to you. Amaze me with your analogies.

[edit] That's it?

As I previously (and specifically) stated, I have absolutely no problem with spelling words incorrectly, I simply found it amusing that it was you who corrects spelling and yet you spelt a word incorrectly. I was not patronizing or telling you off, simply informing you of your mistake. As for my, clean comment I was simply refering to that statement, not any other articles I posted. Now, on to your news link. It was described as rape, but in my argument, I was refering to sexual intercourse, not oral or any other type. Also, I said it was extremely rare and almost unheard of, not impossible. Finally, in my opinion, I would say the man was lying, I mean, what man wouldn't give consent? He probably fell out with her afterwards and wanted revenge. P.S. How did you find that- it seems quite disturbing. P.P.S. What's your Wikidress? (I invented that word, but doesn't it sound cool?. I know you'll say no, but hey, who cares. I know you'll say you do, but, frankly, I don't care.)

[edit] Have you heard of paragraphs?!

How did I find that? Magic!
That was confusing. All I see are many words, lumped together. 'Telling me off'? We're back to primary school! (:
How was I to know that you were refering to intercourse, not oral? The conversation was about rape. Please specify, next time, what type of abuse you are pertaining to. So such a dreadful ambiguity does not occur once again.
Why do you think that I don't think that's a cool word? You don't know me! (that, and I don't know what you mean by 'Wikidress') On another note, you're confuddling me. First you assume that I don't think it's a cool word. Then you say that you know that I'll say that I care...? What the hell? O_o
So, where are these promised metaphors?

[edit] End of Argument

Let's face the facts, my comments weren't amazing, and in the future I'll specify what I mean. You didn't really argue there, just rambled. Let's stop this pointless argument and discuss something, not argue. If you think I'm saying I've won the argument then, fine, it's a stalemate. Or if you really want to have some deep rooted winning feeling against me then I'll say you won. No matter what, lets forget it. If you want a topic, how about Zelda? If not, then you give a topic. I'll check up in the new school year, and mabye (there's a small chance) I'll check this in the hols. P.S. Hope you aren't too ill (you looked pretty pissed off in art)

[edit] Stalemate is an ugly word

I like 'draw' better. In any case, a fresh start for a new year. Or, whenever you read this.
Zelda sounds like a splendiferous topic. Can't wait for the new game(s)! I might just go and buy a GameCube just to play Twilight Princess. But there's always Phantom Hourglass on the DS, I guess.
I'm feeling much better, thanks. It wasn't really a pissed off kind of thing, it was more of an "I-want-to-die-NOW" kind of thing.
Anyhow, I might look out every now and again here. Have a good summer!
P.S. Just one last thing about the argument. I found that rape article, because I read the Norwegian news :D. I've been reading for a while now. It's strange what one finds, isn't it?

[edit] I got on in Core Tech

This is definately the last time, I'm on so I'll start the new topic. If you're gonna get a 'cube, they're about 20 quid preowned. That's dirt cheap. Or alternatively, Twilight Princess is a launch title for the Wii, which wiill probably cost about 100 - 150 quid if you wanna splash out. TP will have more functions on the Wii such as boomerang aiming, fishing and sword fighting which should be good, and improved graphics. Also, the Wii is compatible with the DS, which should be good. Phantom Hourglass looks good too. Can't wait.

[edit] Boing

According to zelda.com, 'in the Wii version of the game, The Legend of Zelda: The Twilight Princess delivers incredibly precise aiming control using the Wii remote', and horseback riding. Is the Wii compatible with the DS in this game? I might ask for it for my birthday, as it's apparantly a fall release. Next topic's your choice.

[edit] Boing

Hi again. Boring summer. Wii realease is December 8th in Europe and includes Wii sports, Nunchuk and all the essentials. It costs £179 and games are current gen price, ie £34-£39. It sounds good, but it really sucks compared to the USA and Japanese as they get it on November 19th and for £133 (US) and £113 (Japan). Oh well, looks like I'm not gonna get one for Xmas. I haven't heard anything about Zelda and DS compatibility, but mabye. I dunno what new topic... ladies first.

[edit] Hardly a lady

You have a thing for being chivalrous, don't you?
There's always the option of getting it from Japan, I guess. YesAsia might export it.
Considering the expense of the Wii, and the delay (and perhaps there won't be any decent games after Zelda), I may just get a Gamecube and be damned.

[edit] ???

Blashphemer (spelt wrongly). The Cube may have been a bit dodgy but TP is on it as is WW, GX, Sunshine, DD et al . Rock on.

[edit] ???

Yeah. I think that we've run out of things to talk about on here. Besides, it's more fun harrassing you in English than over the Internet.

[edit] Hybrid Flower Monkey

A tag has been placed on Hybrid Flower Monkey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 16:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)