Talk:Doctor Faustus (Thomas Mann novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is in serious need of a major rewrite--24.111.60.193 03:38, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
- If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. You don't even need to log in, although there are several reasons why you might want to. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. --W(t) 03:39, 2005 May 8 (UTC)
- I've never read Mann. Perhaps someone who has can rewrite this?--24.111.60.193 03:27, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
- I can always translate and merge the German W article. Let's see when I get around to it. Arbor 06:10, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
- I've never read Mann. Perhaps someone who has can rewrite this?--24.111.60.193 03:27, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- OK, done it. As always, when I translate from the German, my English becomes awkward, so a native anglophone should look it over. I would also like to add a plot summary and and overview of the characters. (It's been a while since I read it, but the 'net has plenty of information to help me along.) The thematic section would benefit from expansion as well. On the other hand, I am less than thrilled with the current Political implications section. The style is not very encyclopedic, and the contents are not neutral. I would like to just scrap that whole section. (That is not to say that the political implications are unimportant. They certainly deserve a paragraph under Themes.) Arbor 07:55, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
-
I originally authored the ""Political Implications"" section, but looking at it now, I agree with Arbor's critique. I'm going ahead and removing it. I do think the question of the moral health of nations is essential to the novel, so I'll keep at least a reference to that in the ""Themes"" section. Joesilber 28 June 2005
- Joe, thanks for looking into this again. I agree with your assessment of the book and its themes, and I hope you down take my comments so far as to eliminate what might become a valuable thematic section for this book. (Which is why I never got around to actually removing the section.) I think a healthy dose of rewriting and attributing is all that is needed. I would be happy if you gave it a shot; WP's laudable insistence on WP:NPOV and WP:NOR shouldn't imply that our literature articles become mere plot summaries, uninformative, or downright boring. Arbor 29 June 2005 08:47 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalized Links
Black Caspar points to the article on Dan Regan (who does have a project called Black Caspar), but not to a Black Caspar page. I have removed the link, please absorb.