Talk:Dixie Mafia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It's rumored that The Dixie Mafia has developed angel wings for Heaven. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.88.144.121 (talk • contribs). How are things in Kalamazoo-zoo-zoo, anywhere near Detroit?

[edit] Southern Mafia

I have cut the following paragraph...

  • More recently, the term has been used, as well, to refer to certain conservative Congressmen from the South [1] working together for a shared political purpose, as in "Truman presented Congress with a package of legislation that would have made lynching a federal crime, would have outlawed the poll tax and discrimination in interstate transportation, and would have barred discrimination in the armed services, in federal Civil Service jobs, and in work done under government contract. The Southern Mafia in the Senate, using the filibuster, killed all those bills." [2]

There are several problems with this... first, the article states that the term Southern Mafia is synonymous with Dixie Mafia except for this political usage... so why raise the political usage of the term at all? It has nothing to do with the Dixie Mafia (the title of this article). Second, the article states that the Dixie Mafia started in the 1960s... so how does a quote about politics during the Truman administration fit with this? It can not have anything to do with the topic of the article. Blueboar 12:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

To answer your questions in order: First, "comparing and contrasting" are stock in trade for this kind of writing.

  1. ^ MOSTEK, RAYMOND, "Judge Not, GOP," The Progressive POPULIST, March 1999 - Vol. 5, No. 3.
  2. ^ SHERRILL, ROBERT, "Master, or Puppet? LBJ as Yanker of Chains, Kisser of Butts," The Texas Observer, August 02, 2002.

Second, just because the writing about the Dixie/Southern Mafia is relatively recent, one must not suppose that it is, too. A large number of the people traditionally involved and affected were illiterate. --216.77.231.87 13:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


How is this "comparing and contrasting"? I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to say. My point is that the first part of the article defines "Dixie Mafia" in very specific ways... ones that do not jibe with the political usage of "Southern Mafia".
Let me give you another example... the article says that "All members of the Dixie Mafia were former prisoners from either the state or federal prison systems." This works for "Southern Mafia" if we limit our discussion to the first part of that section ... but it certainly doesn't work with the "Southern Mafia" in the Senate that is being referred to in the Texas Observer quote. Surely the Senators were not former prison inmates! In other words... We are obviously talking about something very different in this political usage of the term "Southern Mafia"... one that does not fit with the rest of the article. Blueboar 14:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
A separate and disparate use is certainly a contrast worth noting. --MBHiii 16:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I have temporarily removed the Southern Mafia section of this article pending a decision on the AfD debate for Southern mafia. It is essentially a cut-and-paste from the article being reviewed for deletion and copying the content en-masse while it is being considered for deletion is inappropriate. It may be more appropriate to add some of the material (properly sourced and cleaned up) after the fate of the original material has been decided. Arkyan 16:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Iran Contra and Jack Abramoff links

The original edit by Blueboar removing these links from the "See Also" section were done in good faith as there is no apparent connection between these articles and this one. Nowhere in this article is anything about Iran Contra or Jack Abramoff mentioned, and nowhere in those two articles does anything remotely mention Dixie Mafia. The connection is neither implied by the text nor is it explicitly mentioned anywhere - how anyone could possibly interperet this as vandalism is beyond me. Unless it can be shown there is some logical reason to link these articles, stop reverting good faith edits. See WP:3RR. Arkyan • (talk) 20:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

The connection between Dixie Mafia and Iran Contra is detailed in the source cited with "Contra" in the title. Jack Abramoff is yet another felon, linked to gambling in the South, involved corruptly with public figures or officials there to aid gambling; because that is a new ongoing case, one can only read of other instances linking gambling, official corruption, and the Dixie Mafia in sources cited. MBHiii 20:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
The first connection is fairly tenuous - the author of the source in question first links the Iran-Contra business to a Mr. Seal, and then Seal to the "Dixie Mafia". That seems a little weak a connection to me but if you insist on readding that to the "See Also" I won't object further. The idea that Abramoff is a convicted felon involved in the same types of business as the "Dixie Mafia" is even less a tenuous connection - essentially a "guilty by association" connection. It would be inappropriate to keep that link there without something more substantial. Arkyan • (talk) 20:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
As a point of logic, "less a tenuous connection" is a stronger one. If it showed he's a member of the Dixie Mafia, what you seem to require, it'd be in the article. (The case is a good example, though, of an Unholy Alliance...) It's only a link to show that official corruption by gambling interests in the South is an ongoing problem, like the official corrupting effects of organized crime making and transporting marijuana and meth. MBHiii 21:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
It should have been more tenuous, that was a typo. In any case demonstrating the corruption of officials (by gambling interests or otherwise) is a more general issue and not not directly related to this one, so putting links or information to that effect here is inappropriate Items in the "see also" sections should have a more direct correlation to the topic at hand. Arkyan • (talk) 21:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
My edit was indeed in good faith. I saw no mention of Iran Contra or the Abramoff Scandal in the article, nor any mention of the Dixie Mafia on the articles about those subjects, and assumed it was a hold over from the deleted material on Southern Mafia. Personally, I tend to agree with Arkyan that to qualify for a "See Also", there should be at least a mention of the connection in either the article or in the article being pointed to. However, I don't see it as being important enough to get into revert wars about. Blueboar 22:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../d/i/x/Talk%7EDixie_Mafia_e448.html"