Talk:Disk laser

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yes, Srleffler; something wromg with citations.. I try to understand, what is the matter. dima 09:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] combine with active mirror?

I know how to improve the citations. I do it.

By the way, how about to combine this article with active mirror?

dima 09:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Since active mirror seems to be just an earlier name for a disk laser, the contents of that article should be merged here, and that article should be replaced with a redirect to here. Wikipedia articles are organized by thing, not by name. Each thing gets one article (normally), regardless of how many names it has.
By the way, is the title spelled correctly? The normal spelling for the geometric figure is "disc", not "disk". Floppy disks are an exception to normal English spelling.--Srleffler 05:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

C O M B I N E D !!! dima 14:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Institute for Laser Science

Mein Gott, the articles Institute for Laser Science and Laboratory of Laser Energetic are not yet at Wiki??? Or I again misspell the names? dima 09:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Laboratory for Laser Energetics has an article.--Srleffler 05:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks, Srleffler!

Hi, Srleffler. I got your smile. Thank you.
I try to arrange links before to combine the articles.
I corrected the links to the institutes you mention.
The spelling of the disk is not so easy: in some publicaitons it appears as disk, in some as disc. Perhaps, we should mention both spellings. dima 14:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] formatting

It seems, some non-ascii character in the references instead of - (separator in indication of pages) causes a conflict with math expression, if appear in the same paragraph; this leads to the wrong formatting; which appears after to save, and is not seen at the preview. I just replaced this character, and now the paragraph looks much better. Is it only at my conputer, or other users see the same? dima 03:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Fig.1. from Image:DiskLaser.png).
Fig.1. from Image:DiskLaser.png).

The problem with formulas disappeared, but now some problem with Fig.1. Since today, it appears as {?] in the article. Is it because of the license, of because of the format, or a wikibug? I have converted it to jpg,

Fig.1a. )Image:DiskLaserJPEG.jpg
Fig.1a. )Image:DiskLaserJPEG.jpg

,

it seems to work, but now some formulas appear as [?], Now previous versions also do not look better... What is the matter?

dima 03:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)