User talk:Dietary Fiber
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'd love to see some chess problems, especially nice easy ones that I can just click on. "Wikipedia is not paper", and there's no problem with storage space on the server. So, why not? --Uncle Ed 19:58 Mar 28, 2003 (UTC)
I need more of you. I want to eat you. --Uncle Ed 00:53 Apr 3, 2003 (UTC)
Like my own anti-imperialist user page? --Paektu
As you've been told under many different incarnations, differences of opinion are not Vandalism. -- Zoe
Hey, do you know what is the deal with zoe, 172, and jtdirl? Susan Mason
Talking to yourself now, Susan? We all know you are Dietary Fiber and used to be Lir and Vera Cruz, both banned for the sort behaviour that you know practice. People have just had enough of your behaviour at this stage and are watching your every edit carefully. STÓD/ÉÍRE 20:28 Apr 12, 2003 (UTC)
DIETARY=SUSAN=VERA=LIR: http://www.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2003-April/002479.html
Mate, just back off for a little while. Trust me on this advice. You've probably gone too far aready, but if you back off right away, there is just a slim chance that nothing bad will happen. I know you are in the middle of a raging shouting match with 172 and JTD, and I know that JTD can be as rude as buggery sometimes (hell - he can be ruder than me, and that ain't easy!), but your position here is not one that enables you to take them on right now. (For the record, I have no idea who is "right" and who is "wrong" in this current dispute, nor do I intend to investigate for myself to find out - I'm happily tied up doing other stuff at present.) I should have written this earlier, before the shit really hit the fan. For that my apologies. But maybe if you keep a low profile for a while ... It's worth trying. Best -- Tannin
If you're really not Adam/Bridget/Lir/Susan Mason/Vera Cruz, why not go to the mailing list and give us proof of this? Then I will publicly apologize. -- Zoe
North Korea is not a country, and it is not "third world." (Korea is a country.) --141.219.44.92
User:Zoe You not boss lady. Tuf Kat say so absolute not. Why are you so nasty to this person Dietary Fiber? How you call them by many names? You call other people names too and upset them. Why? You make this not a nice place. I go now. User:Wei Chin Ho P.S. I study psychology. Zoe shows many symptoms paranoid. Really sad.
- LOL! All these personas pretending to be or not be the same person really make me laugh. Don't you have anything better to do? C'mon, we're trying to create an encyclopedia here. We all enjoy a good laugh now and then, but please try not to take it too far. You wouldn't want to hurt another contributor's feelings, would you? --Uncle Ed 20:05 Apr 15, 2003 (UTC)
[edit] Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
