User talk:Dibo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Older messages are in the archive.
I am in fact the Ehinger..... furthermore I agree that I should be banned. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.225.218.210 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 5 September, 2006 (UTC)
that's nice Dibo 07:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] A-League Newsletter II, 2006
Issue II – September 2006 |
|
|
06:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
|
[edit] Banning
You should be banned. You contribute slightly more than NIL except for stalking things that do not even exist. hahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahah
07:27, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Topcattheirrefutable
[edit] The Ehinger and sockpuppets
You may be interested to see a message posted on my talk page from Topcattheirrefutable. There he admits to having sockpuppets. I replied on his talk page. Thought you'd be interested, especially considering i noticed that there hasn't been a conclusion yet on the sockpuppetry evidence page. CattleGirl 07:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Dibo, thanks for the heads-up - I wasn't aware of ehinger and am reading it all now. I've blocked the topcat account FYI. -- I@n 03:14, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- In the meantime, SG has requested the case be re-opened. Will watch with interest. -- I@n 03:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reference
Cheers for fixing up that reference with the CCMFC article. I was restructuring the whole sentence (it was very POV, how it was), but it's good to see interest in the article. I nominated it for Football Collaboration of the Week a little while ago, and it looks like it will make it - I reckon that it could be the first FA for the Wikiproject. Anyways, thanks, and keep up the good work, Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 05:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bob Debus
I don't know if you are unaware of how Parliamentary Privilege works, or you're just a Labor hack. See here:
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,20771001-421,00.html?from=public_rss
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,20773189-1702,00.html?from=public_rss
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,20769674-1702,00.html?from=public_rss
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,20769367-2,00.html?from=public_rss
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,20768918-29277,00.html?from=public_rss
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,20768386-2,00.html?from=public_rss
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,20770673-5001021,00.html
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,20771001-5005941,00.html
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,20768916-5001021,00.html
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200611/s1790635.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200611/s1790547.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200611/s1790272.htm
http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/11/16/debnam-names-debus/
http://blueberryfool.blogspot.com/2006/11/peter-debnam-could-lose-race-of-one.html
http://juliesblog17.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!1673CB0833821492!1983.entry
http://www.rowen.id.au/blog/2006/11/peter-debnam-is-a-goose/
http://phyo-phyo.blogspot.com/2006/11/debnam-says-debus-is-under.html
http://starshark.blogging.com/blog/_archives/2006/11/16/2503899.html
http://theop-inion.blogspot.com/2006/11/debnam-deadbeat.html
Stating that an allegation was made is clearly not libellous. I will be restoring the information as well as including Debus' admission that he was investigated for paying an underage boy for sex. Please don't touch it until you have a better grasp on Parliamentary Privilege. --219.89.44.200 22:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mediation Case
Cheers for raising the request for mediation :) BTW did you get to see the "great" Romario play at Gosford? The SMH was rather scathing about his performance. 13:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- If I was in Sydney I would come up to Gosford, but after the World Cup I moved to Edinburgh :) I know what you mean about frustration at the moment, but I have noticed the more often he posts, the more often others clean up as well. Tancred 22:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- I'm about to add User:Topcattheirrefutable to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ehinger222 (2nd) Tancred 09:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- And another one User:Caesar34 :( Tancred 11:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Is this all you ever do on wiki Dibo, LOL. To read you I am the antichrist as well.
-
-
-
-
- [1], Dibo, it was nice to look through your contributions and find this, lol, you are really starting to develop a complex. I suppose I am the source of all things rugby league football is not soccer to you, haha. Do you understand the concept of pelican droppings? That if you leave a trace here, it will be found by another and another and than snowball? Like the recent commentary over Alan Oakley using comments from http://www.stoush.net?? I do not believe that evidence by the way because I remember it being changed in November of last year. Anyways, good luck with the sockpuppet case. Another strike for righteous indignation in this overly rude world. --Caesar34 11:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- your [here] is a dead giveaway - misspelling 'common' as 'commen' is a dead giveaway. see [first sockpuppet page about you]:
- "stereotypical misspellings, like 'commen' and common style of edits and comments on talk pages"
- so... there it is again. Dibo T | C 11:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- your [here] is a dead giveaway - misspelling 'common' as 'commen' is a dead giveaway. see [first sockpuppet page about you]:
- [1], Dibo, it was nice to look through your contributions and find this, lol, you are really starting to develop a complex. I suppose I am the source of all things rugby league football is not soccer to you, haha. Do you understand the concept of pelican droppings? That if you leave a trace here, it will be found by another and another and than snowball? Like the recent commentary over Alan Oakley using comments from http://www.stoush.net?? I do not believe that evidence by the way because I remember it being changed in November of last year. Anyways, good luck with the sockpuppet case. Another strike for righteous indignation in this overly rude world. --Caesar34 11:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] please substitute vandal templates
Hi. I saw that you added this template ({{test2-n|Australian Labor Party}}) to User talk:61.8.46.16. Please remember to substitute such templates. Use the templates at WP:VAND so that you instead place a template similar to this: {{subst:test2|Australian Labor Party}}. Cheers, Jpeob 00:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mediation Cabal
Hello, I am going to be one of the mediators listening to your case. Please see Alan Oakley Mediation Cabal to participate in this voluntary mediation. Somitho 21:46, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] LMAO
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ehinger222 (2nd), dude, you are getting delusional! --Ehinger222 05:40, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- He has been back for about a week now, but until yesterday was just tweaking 3 articles each day. I'm not sure how we go about banning an IP range. I can be done but I would assume there would need to be checks to see if other users are using any of the IP's. I'm going to put together a case again today, as Ehinger222 has created 3 socks in the last week alone.Tancred 09:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please calm down
The message you left at my talk could very easily be interpreted as abuse. Please calm down, or I will have no other option than to report you to an administrater. I think that what is happenning here is a case of mistaken identity, that is the only reason I have not sought out an administrater yet. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.132.217.29 (talk) 10:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC).
- go completely bananas. don't care. am too sick of cleaning up your bullshit edits to be at all perturbed if a ban means i can't. you're nothing but a source of pollution to wikipedia. Dibo T | C 10:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Which pages are these? – Riana ঋ 11:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] new checkuser
Thanks for adding the new checkuser request. I'm not sure what was missed in the last request, but the admins involved seem to do 200-300 edits a day, making it almost impossible to scan their contributions to find what was needed.Tancred 14:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- What was missed was any evidence. I am not a sockmaster with a vast array of puppets. Your presentation of evidence is so unscrupulous and dishonest that I am sure anybody who views it with proper investigation would dismiss it out of hand which has now happenned three times. I think I have a very good case for arguing that yourself and Tancred stop reverting the pages that I edit, as any reversion is laced with personal abuse, personal attacks and is not based on reasonable argument, working towards a consensus on talk pages and all the other decent rules on wikipedia. If my edits are objectionable(as they well may be, I am only a woman with what may be my own prejudices that I seek to avoid when editing), please take your objections to a third person so that they can be judiciously treated. I have been banned twice, both overturned, for accusations that you have made. If you do not stop harassing my edits with personal attacks etcetera, I may have to ask an admin that you be banned. Thanks in advance 144.132.219.160 05:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)