Talk:Dialga
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Image
Great photoshopping job on this coro-coro scan. However, one issue with it is that the spike-ish thing protruding from behind Diaruga's head isn't supposed to be there; it is actually a part of Parukia that's standing behind the Pokemon, so I suggest someone fix that detail. Thanks. Erik the Appreciator 03:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Someone do something about that image!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.37.216.17 (talk) 20:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Removed. Hello2112 20:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Nominated for deletionSkarlotte 15:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Typing
What type is Diaruga?--User:Rat235478683-- 23:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
That we don't know at the moment. It hasn't been officially revealed anywhere. But I can assure you that the information will be put here about five minutes after it is revealed somewhere, whenever that is. Erik the Appreciator 01:31, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Diaruga does not appear in the 9th movie. Please update anything regarding this if you use Wiki as a potential source. XenoL-Type 03:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Is there any official info that states Parukia is really Diaruga's "rival"?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.37.23.195 (talk) 03:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Apparently not, though it'd be inconceivable that they are not rivals. Just like Red & Blue's cover Pokemon Charizard and Blastoise are "rivals", Gold & Silver's Lugia and Ho-Oh are "rivals", and Ruby and Sapphire's Kyogre and Groudon are definite rivals, the D/P cover Pokemon Diaruga and Parukia being rivals is accepted to be the truth regardless of the lack of the official info. Erik the Appreciator 06:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
where'd you get 'Dialga' from? I thought it was Diaruga. Has anybody even announced its english name yet?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.132.84.36 (talk) 03:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC) –It hasn't been. This is just a fan assumption and I say we baleet it. Evan1109 01:23, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Fixed the serebii link, as it was linking to the wrong poke.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.40.84.7 (talk) 14:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dialga? What?
OK, Nintendo hasn't confirmed the official romanization of Diaruga yet, so until further notice this should be at Diaruga. It has no place here at Dialga. Double Dash 20:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- I was wondering the same thing. Diagla doesn't even sound right! -24.92.41.95 12:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- I know I'd have read it on SPP or PPN. They've never mentioned 'Dialga'. I'll request moves for both this and Palkia. Double Dash 21:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- SPP never mentions new romanizations. These romanizations were posted on www.Filb.de which is a very reliable site that has never posted unconfirmed stuff. It is very possible that the trademarks "Dialga" and "Palkia" were found on some Pokemon merchandise. Just because you don't like the romanizations doesn't make them fake. --Lividore 03:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- I know I'd have read it on SPP or PPN. They've never mentioned 'Dialga'. I'll request moves for both this and Palkia. Double Dash 21:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was no move. -- tariqabjotu 23:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
Dialga → Diaruga – Dialga has never been confirmed, or even suggested, as the official Romanization for Parukia. Double Dash 22:15, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Support - Yeah, we need confirmation before we can officialy name the article "Dialga." Besides, Dairuga sounds way cooler!
- Oppose - These romanizations were confirmed by Filb.de, about the only site that has never posted unconfirmed news, and I've said it about eight times now. This move request is ridiculous; if you don't like the romanizations you'll have to swallow that bitter pill and move on because they're confirmed. Lividore 03:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Indifferent- See Discussion on talk:Palkia. SaturnYoshi 09:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC)- Indifferent - Per above as well as the discussion on Talk:Manaphy -- ~PinkDeoxys~ 20:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Filb.de is not an official website, so they can't confirm what the name is. TJ Spyke 04:48, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Supportread above statement.--DarkHero 23:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per the fact that the official names will be out in mere days, no need to do this now. Just wait for it. DanPMK 04:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per DanPMK. -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 05:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per DanPMK. Also, I believe trademarkings have been given for the name. - Tetsuya-san (talk : contribs) 05:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC).
- Addition to my opposition. I was right: パルキア at http://www1.ipdl.ncipi.go.jp/syutsugan/TM_AREA_A.cgi (a government site for trademark filings) brings up Palkia as ディアルガ brings up Dialga. - Tetsuya-san (talk : contribs) 06:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well there you have it. Solid proof. -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 07:13, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Addition to my opposition. I was right: パルキア at http://www1.ipdl.ncipi.go.jp/syutsugan/TM_AREA_A.cgi (a government site for trademark filings) brings up Palkia as ディアルガ brings up Dialga. - Tetsuya-san (talk : contribs) 06:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Add any additional comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.