Talk:Dewan Negara

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dewan Negara was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake. Date of review: No date specified. Please edit template call function as follows: {{FailedGA|insert date in any format here}}

[edit] Failed Good Article

This doesn't deserve its own article. joturner 22:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

I hate to use the systemic bias reply, which is overused IMO, but if Senate of Barbados or Senate of Zimbabwe get their own articles, why can't the Malaysian one? If the argument is that the article duplicates some of Parliament of Malaysia's content, well, the article will have to be broken out in the future, making the merge pointless. Johnleemk | Talk 10:45, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyvio?

Take a look at http://www.senat.fr/senatsdumonde/english/malaisie.html. The similarities aren't an accident. __earth 08:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)