Talk:Deuteros

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	CVG Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
CVG To-do: edit  Gaming Collaboration of the week: Baldur's Gate series Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks Merge: Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)

[edit] Needs polishing

The Deuteros article sounds more like a game review or a rant than an objective article in an encyclopedia.

More information and other views on the subject would be highly appreciated. Was losing in Millennium really "nearly impossible" as the author claims? Maybe for him/her, but how about an average gamer?

The fifth paragraph ("In Millennium 2.2, there was a start and an end to the game....") could be replaced altogether with a short and general description of the gameplay.

To the author, yours truly, Milllennium quite literally appears next to impossible to actually lose. I figure that game-ending circumstances should be possible, but require deliberate and prolonged action. --Kizor 22:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)