Talk:Deuteromycota
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Deuteromycota is supported by WikiProject Fungi, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Fungi. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. |
||
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
||
| High | This article is on a subject of high-importance within mycology. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
 |
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality. |
[edit] Number of species
This page should say how many species are in this division. --Savant13 14:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] General
It's in much better shape now. Since this "phylum" is obsolete, I don't feel it needs a photo or much further information. It should be more like a redirect page. A few issues remain:
- It is not worth developing articles on the obsolete classification within the group, so internal links to nonexistent articles could be removed from the Historical section.
- There should be prominent outgoing links to the pages on mould, Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota.
- Elsewhere there is a category called Deuteromycetes that should go away.
- We should dispense with Deuteromycota in taxoboxes (e.g. Cladosporium). We need to differentiate anamorph from teleomorph names because teleomorph names take precedence when known. Can we agree on a convention for anamorph taxoboxes? We need some way to indicate that Penicillium, for e.g., is an anamorph or form genus.
Nemetona 05:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
