Talk:Design Continuum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Design Continuum article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

[edit] References vs External links

I'm not sure how much I should go into this here, but there appears to be some confusion between what are external links and what are references. Some of the relevant policies are WP:EL, WP:SPAM, WP:V, and WP:RS. Some external links have been added as to the reference section, but I'm at a loss to see how the "David or Goliath" article is actually being used as a reference, while the links to Continuum's own pages are probably inappropriate alone. I'm happy to explain further. --Ronz 01:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:COI might be worth skimming, as some of the editors here appear to be Design Continuum employees. --Ronz 02:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting article tags (advert, etc)

In regard to 216.75.130.90's edit summary:

sufficient external links have been provided to outside sources and other pages/sites. only facts are represented.

Please see WP:V - we need verifiable facts. I'm trying my best to flesh out this article. I'm more concerned than ever that there are WP:COI issues here. --Ronz 18:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)