User talk:Der Eberswalder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(older diskussions can be found in the archive)
Contents |
[edit] Copernicus
Please don't remove the warning comment there. It took hard work to make the article neutral, and any change might trigger new edit wars. It once said "Mikołaj Kopernik ... was ...Polish astronomer", for example.
If you are concerned with naming issues, look at Wikipedia:Requested moves or pages were a survey is conducted, like Talk:Kraków grosh. For neutrality see Wikipedia:Neutrality Project or Category:NPOV disputes, were many articles are listed (not sorted to specific conflicts, like German-Polish, for example Talk:Wojciech Kętrzyński). -- Matthead discuß! O 14:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Prussian is neutral, because Royal Prussia was a part of the Kingdom of Poland. I will change it back. --Der Eberswalder 19:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- You have to explain that to others, not me ... don't be surprised if you face an avalanche of "Prussia was Polish fief, thus he was Polish", "Encyclopedia XYZ calls him Polish astronomer and so should we" and the like. Same goes for town names, see many talk pages related to e.g.
Cracow and Danzig, ooops Kraków and Gdańsk. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matthead (talk • contribs) 21:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC).
- You have to explain that to others, not me ... don't be surprised if you face an avalanche of "Prussia was Polish fief, thus he was Polish", "Encyclopedia XYZ calls him Polish astronomer and so should we" and the like. Same goes for town names, see many talk pages related to e.g.
-- Hallo, you might be interested in PRUr. 1224 Catania etc-. If you have a lot of time, energy and interest you might want to help a bit on names- but- vorsichtig- please don't feed the trolls as Matthead is already asking- thanks- Labbas 13 January 2007
[edit] Greetings!
Hello, Der Eberswalder! Would you mind offering your input regarding some comments of mine at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Prussia#Article merge? Also, feel free to check out the Wikipedia:German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board in case you have not heard of it before. Cheers, Olessi 23:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Konfederacio Orienta Prusio
- I'd like to thank you for putting together the Konfederacio Orienta Prusio article, which I found very inspirational, though it does seem to be original research. [1] I hope this movement will soon have a dedicated "official site" this article can reference. FYI - I posted about it on a Free State Project related forum. -AlexLibman 21:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Yes, it is original research, that's why it had to be moved to my user page. --Der Eberswalder 23:21, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- When it was moved there were still some redirects pointing to it from the article namespace. These aren't allowed (see Wikipedia:Redirect) so I've listed them for deletion. Just letting you know. Interesting article. Thanks. --Cherry blossom tree 00:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ok. I redirect it then to where it linked before I redirected it to my userspace. --Der Eberswalder 02:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Your idea is original research, and as it lacks notability, it should not be mentioned in any Wikipedia article. I've also deleted Flag of Konfederacio Orienta Prusio (European Free State Project) and Another proposed flag of Konfederacio Orienta Prusio (European Free State Project) as inappropriate redirects. Thanks.--Pharos 17:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- When it was moved there were still some redirects pointing to it from the article namespace. These aren't allowed (see Wikipedia:Redirect) so I've listed them for deletion. Just letting you know. Interesting article. Thanks. --Cherry blossom tree 00:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WPFC
Thanks for all your work on the various entries and navbars for former German states. To help co-ordinate work in this area, I'd like to invite you to join the Former Countries WikiProject and the HRE taskforce. WPFC is the more-active parent project of the Prussia WikiProject, which I would also like to invite you to join. If you have any ideas on how to better co-ordinate and display these articles, please share them with us. - 52 Pickup 21:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] gugu
[edit] Lower Saxon Circle???
What is this? Some historical artifact invented by the Nazis? There never ever was such thing, and Goslar was never ever Prussian until it was defeated and annexed by Prussian in 1866 at Langensalza, so relatively spoken for not very long. The Holy German empire came factually to an end with the onset of the Thirty Years war in 1618, and thus has only existed since on paper until Napolean finally put an end to it in 1805 -- Goslar was protestant and as such not answerable tax-wise or army-wise to the Catholic Austrian (holy roman) emporer Maximillian I. in 1495 at Worms (even before the Reformation, the Austrian emporer was an emporer without portefolio--since the regional Kings, Electors and Dukes had the say in their lands). This became evident as the Protestant League of Schmalkalden allied itself against Charles V with France and Danemark to fend off the Catholics (Austrians and Bavarians), who were culturally, lingually and ethnically different from the ethnic Saxons, around whom the Protestant resistance against the Emporer had gathered. With the treaty of Augsburg in 1555 the reichskreise disappeared. It was the Electorate of Hanover and the Duchy of Brunswick to which Goslar de facto belonged. Only between 1933 and 1945 the Nazis reinvented them! German history 0 points I am afraid.
Territorially, ethnically, politically Goslar and the region was a part of the the Electorate of Hanover (ethnic and not pseudo Saxony around Dresden!), which extended deeply to the West (encompassing Frisia) to the border of the Netherlands, and never ever Mecklenburg was a part of it!! These Reichskreise might have been devised by the Austrian Emporer in Vienna (1495-while there was much unrest in the Northern parts of the Holy German empire and in 1517 Luther pinned his 95 thesis to the doors of the church in Wittenberg .to the joy of the emporer in vienna), but the Reichskreise had no factual or political meaning. What counted were the boundaries of the Guelphic territories: Brunswick & Hanover. So would you please stop to propagate such incorrect facts! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.157.239.230 (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC).
- Please write this information into the imperial circle article and provide sources. Thanks. --Der Eberswalder 21:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Move
I think you'll be interested in this:Talk:Historical_Eastern_Germany#Requested_move. -- Hrödberäht (talk) 21:00, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sockpuppetry case
 |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Der Eberswalder for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.
jergen 19:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
