User talk:Dennisthe2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] RE:
Please put new discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Social Dynamics (2nd nomination), and not an old archive. Thank you. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 00:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Good work
Kudos for dealing with the anons in the Brandford Punk Rock AFD scene. I shy away from such madness, so I'm proud of you for handling it well. YechielMan 04:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Urban Search and Rescue South Carolina Task Force 1
The article appears to have survivied the AfD, at least for now. I was just curious if we would have persuaded you with the information we provided after you switched your vote to neutral? Specifically I'm referring to the link to CBS's The Early Show interview with Tracy Smith. What happens now? Is the article "safe" or could this come up again at any time? I'd like to think we would have achieved consensus given one or two more days. Thanks for your help. I have to admit the process improved the article. Best, MoodyGroove 15:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC)MoodyGroove
- Here are the links to the media sources. If you have a dial-up connection, you may not be able to see the video:
- URL for the Video clip from CBS's The Early Show with Janet Smith (this is the one you didn't know about).
- SC-TF1 in the ETV and PBS special documentary "Care from the heart" Sept. 9, 2005 (Updated November 14, 2005). Video clips: Dial-up. Broadband. Fast-forward to 10:45. Also 22.55. MoodyGroove 15:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)MoodyGroove
[edit] Thanks
Thanks for the advice, I'll try and implement it a bit more. LazyDaisy
[edit] Barnstar
You deserve this
 |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
| For your comment at the Lana Lesley AFD you definitely deserve this! --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Regis redirect
You can withdraw the nomination and when it's closed redirect the article. Otto4711 21:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quizap
I have asked User:Quarl to reopen the AFD. What I deleted was not the subject of the AFD, but a blanked redirect page. The reason for the AFD closure is, thus, based on a misunderstanding of the situation on his part. We'll see how he responds. - TexasAndroid 17:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Community AfD
You may want to look at the current version of the article and consider revising your opinion since the current version has multiple reliable sources including a note about a notable award the community has recieved. Thanks JoshuaZ 02:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] List of YWAM bases
Thanks Dennis for formatting my cluttered posts. It's the first time one of the articles I've created have been AFD so I wasn't sure if I was allowed to vote. I've gone ahead and done what you suggested. --Davidkazuhiro 03:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important homeopaths
You previously commented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important homeopaths, writing:
*I'm going with Delete here. What constitutes "important" is subjective in this case - it's kind of a fine line. Granted, I could be wrong, but at best we're looking at a merge and redirect to Homeopathy. --Dennisthe2 21:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
The article has since been renamed to List of homeopaths and has also undergone other changes. I am writing to inform you of this in case you would like to revisit the discussion. Thank you, Black Falcon 06:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edward Kearns
I replied your comment at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Edward_Kearns. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chink AfD
The Chink article has been greatly expanded now. Please take a look and see if you are interested in reconsidering your vote for merge. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 14:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re : Trinity Christian HS AFD
You must be referring to the WP:ILIKEIT arguments. IMO the article is now well-attributed and its notability asserted by multiple sources, which essentially addresses the concerns of the nomination. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 18:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Regarding notability of Football (soccer) players
Hi, seeing you have been involved in previous Afd debates on the subject I invite you to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 20:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vote!
Following your contribution to the discussion on football player notability you might be interested in voting on this. Rgds, StephP 10:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
