This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field.
???
This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale.
This article is part of WikiProject Canadian law, an attempt to co-ordinate articles on Canadian law, produce common standards and fill in the gaps. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information).
This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Suggested article edit guidelines:
To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
Before assessing this article, be sure to check the existing Archive of assessments made under the previous system (used until July 2006), and feel free to help in migrating the existing comments besides from adding your own evaluation.
After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
Needs equal treatment for First Nation position: The positions and arguments of the provincial and federal governments are given, but not that of the Gitksan plaintiffs.Skookum1 10:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit]Needs equal treatment for First Nation position
The positions and arguments of the provincial and federal governments are given, but not that of the Gitksan plaintiffs.Skookum1 10:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)