User talk:Deglr6328
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Shock wave
Dear sir,
You have changed the shock wave to its erroneous state. I know that you like to vandalize. Look it is not proper to vandalize, you have very little knowledge of shock wave or compressible flow. Perhaps you should read my book before try to edit my parts. You should read my remarks in the talk section before you make any changes. If you believe that you are right, than you should identify your self and get prize for you new discoveries. I like to know why you think any of the mistakes in shock wave should be remained.
My name is Genick Bar-Meir and you can email me at barmeir at gmail.comor check www.potto.org.
If you do not stop vandalizing I will be forced to ask the administrator for help.
- Deglr6328 - taking care of this, don't bother (unless you want to). Maury 18:38, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, wasn't I supposed to be contacting someone about the copyright status of some image? Argonne maybe? LNLL? Maury 19:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thanks very much for your kind words Maury! someone deleted http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Image:Fiber_optic_bundle.jpg that image (fiber optics) and I gave up trying to keep it in the article. oh well.--Deglr6328 05:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] polycarbonate NIR spectrum - sample thickness?
Deglr6328,
This is my first attempt to do something other than browse/view Wikipedia content, so please be kind. I have a comment regarding the NIR absorbance spectrum for polycarbonate, and this comment may apply to other spectra you have contributed. In the polycarbonate spectrum, the vertical axis is % transmission, but no pathlength/material thickness figure is given. Hence, this is really a relative absorbance spectrum. If the path length is available, it would be really useful if it were indiccated on the spectrum.
Thanks for your contribution, which has been helpful to me already.
Cheers, eqpi
- Cool I'm so glad the information was of use to you! I used a pair of plastic saftey goggles from UVEX to get that transmittance spectrum. Here they are [1]. Unfortunately they dont provide any information on the thickness of the lenses. Tell you what, tomorrow I will measure them and let you know here. --Deglr6328 05:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- The path length of the polycarbonate was 2.3 mm. Hope that helps! --Deglr6328 21:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Peter Pan
On Image:Contaminated Peter Pan peanut butter.jpg, you've failed to provide a source for the image. If you created the image yourself (and I suspect that's probably the case), just say so on the image description next to your "yummy but deadly" comment. In that case, you also might want to change the license tag from {{GFDL}} to {{GFDL-self}}. SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
It is under gfdl-self.--Deglr6328 23:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Gay Germ Theory
Hey it's me, Drowssap Looc. I added a notes section using cite.php. This should make it easy for other people to clean up their referencing. I've already used it for my stuff. It would be great if that article started looking like the Autism page on wiki... I won't hold my breath. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Drowssap Looc (talk • contribs) 02:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] GA on Nova
Well we did it, we passed GA on Nova. Now for HiPER... Maury 00:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- The big problem with HiPER is a lack of outside refs, because the ones I used were sent to me directly by one of the primary investigators. Under normal conditions this would be be a good thing, but... If you have any refs from the print world that would help. And yeah, the cone-in-shell would definitely add to the article, the single picture just doesn't do it. Maury 21:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spectra
Thanks for your spectra charts; I enjoyed them! -- Morcheeba 07:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- sure! glad you like them. --Deglr6328 07:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Incandescent flashlight spectrum.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Incandescent flashlight spectrum.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Srleffler 01:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
PS. See Talk:Black body#Something is wrong with "the spectrum of an incandescent bulb in a typical flashlight"?! for a discussion of why this is necessary.
[edit] Hafnium
Dear Sir, I am intrigued by your hafnium photograph. I work on zirconium and titanium alloys, and occasionnaly on hafnium. Actually, I find the patterns displayed by the colours very interesting. Could you tell me more about the history of the material used for this picture ? Do the colours have their origin in an oxide layer formed at high temperature, and do you know if the lump has been heated over the allotropic transformation temperature (ca. 1750 °C) ? I can be contacted at : nv*at*altern.org
Thank you.
- The lump has been heated to liquification and I suspect the colors are created by thin oxide (or nitride?) layers that formed on the surface when it was taken out of vacuum while still somewhat hot.--Deglr6328 06:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Deionised Water
The HiFog system was selected for the protection of the computer equipment (and other valuable assets) at my company. The system is also used in several other locations where non conductivity of the extinguishant is vital. One of the trials of the system was where it was used to protect a High Voltage AC installation (415 volts). I do not know if they have trialled it for higher voltages. One of the main features is that once the extinguishant has discharged, the protected electrical and electronic equipment can be operational again in just a few hours (presumably excluding the bit that actually set it off in the first place). In view of the value of the assets that these systems are now protecting, I can only assume that the suppliers would not make such boasts wrecklessly, because if they are wrong, we would be suing them for billions. I B Wright 16:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)