User talk:Debeaux

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] Image:Doris.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Doris.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. feydey 15:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Humany

I have moved the contents of that deleted article to User:Debeaux/Humany so that it can be improved by interested parties. After it contains an assertion of notability, and its language is cleaned up so it doesn't sound like an advertisment, it can be moved back to article space. I say this because if you put it back into article space now, it is likely to be deleted again (and not just by me). Thank you, Fang Aili talk 14:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually it's still pretty bad but I'm going to stay away from it for now. --Fang Aili talk 15:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Humany ?

Where goes the fine line between spam and fact/information? When i was explained the software SiteAssistant & SearchAssistant from the Company Humany you erased the information.

For example: the information about Azyxxi, is that advertising/spam or just information? And whats the different to inform about this technology and Humanys technology, SiteAssistant & SearchAssistant?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Debeaux (talk • contribs) 12:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC).

Well the line is somewhat ambiguous. My reasoning was thus: The article is about the company Humany, not SiteAssistant or SearchAssistant. Since neither of those programs appeared notable, and the article is about the company, I determined that describing them was not encyclopedic.
The Azyxxi article is pretty good. Its notability assertion is in the first paragraph (used in a bunch of notable hospitals), and then explains how the product works. In this case the article is about the product, not that product's company, so I think this is appropriate. It also has a few good sources. I hope this answers your question. --Fang Aili talk 14:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../d/e/b/User_talk%7EDebeaux_f156.html"