Deborah Howell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Deborah Howell (born January 15, 1941) is an American journalist who is currently the ombudsman for The Washington Post.
Contents |
[edit] Background
Howell was born in San Antonio, Texas, where her father worked as a journalist at the San Antonio Express-News. She later got into journalism herself, first working on her high school paper and then, as a journalism student, on The Daily Texan, the student newspaper for The University of Texas at Austin. After graduating, Howell had difficulty finding a job as a journalist and would instead take a job as at a local TV and radio station. Eventually, Howell would get a job at the copy desk of the Corpus Christi Caller-Times, before later moving on to the Minneapolis Star as assistant managing editor and then at the St. Paul Pioneer Press as the senior vice president and editor. Howell then went on to become the Washington bureau chief and editor of Newhouse News Service from 1990 until 2005. [1]
She served on the board of directors of the American Society of Newspaper Editors from 1992-1999 and has served on the ASNE Foundation Board since 2000.
[edit] Washington Post career
On February 25, 2005, Howell was named ombudsman of the Washington Post. [2] On October 23, 2005, Howell introduced herself to readers by saying she had two goals in mind: "to foster good journalism and to increase understanding between The Post and its readers." [3]
[edit] Abramoff column controversy
In January 2006, Howell became involved in a dispute with some of her readers over the contents of one of her columns. In her January 15 column defending the reporting by Washington Post reporter Susan Schmidt on lobbyist Jack Abramoff, Howell claimed that Abramoff "had made substantial campaign contributions to both major parties,"[4] referring to the Republicans and Democrats. Many readers took exception to Howell's statement, pointing to Federal Election Commission records that showed Abramoff had given money only to Republicans and none to Democrats. [5]
After receiving many angry comments at the Post's blog, Howell responded: "A better way to have said it would be that Abramoff 'directed' contributions to both parties." [6]
This did not satisfy some readers of the blog, who responded that although Abramoff's clients did give money to both parties, there was no evidence that Abramoff "directed" contributions to Democrats and furthermore, that Abramoff's clients had given less money to Democrats than non-Abramoff clients. [7]
As the demands on the blog for a retraction and correction continued, the management of the Post decided to shut down and pull all comments from the blog. Jim Brady, executive editor of washingtonpost.com, explained this by saying that there had been "personal attacks, the use of profanity and hate speech" by "a significant number of folks". Some readers were skeptical of his claims and brought forth a mirror site of the blog that showed that there were relatively few posts fitting Brady's description. Brady responded by saying that the comments never showed up on the blog because management had been removing the them as soon as they were posted.[8] The Post has since restored 948 comments.
On January 22, 2006, Howell discussed the controversy started by her column the previous week. She repeated the statement that Abramoff had directed his clients to donate to both parties, but this time referred to her original assertion as a mistake and agreed that the Abramoff scandal is "not a bipartisan scandal; it's a Republican scandal." Howell went on to describe some of the "abusive" comments and e-mails she received, saying "I'll read every e-mail and answer as many legitimate complaints as I can ... But I will reject abuse and all that it stands for," adding, "... I have a tough hide, and a few curse words (which I use frequently) are not going to hurt my feelings." The kicker for the column summed up her attitude about the whole matter: "To all of those who wanted me fired, I'm afraid you're out of luck. I have a contract. For the next two years, I will continue to speak my mind. Keep smiling. I will."[9]
