From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Name: Dan Geist (aka Daniel Geist / Daniel Charles Geist )
Location: New York City, New York, United States of America
Email: dancharlesgeist@hotmail.com
Wikipedia contributor since September 2005
[edit] Interests
[edit] Major articles (and related articles) extensively expanded and revised
[edit] Articles initiated
- block booking
- Film Booking Offices of America—replacing stub filled with errors from its very name to its final sentence
- Jean Grémillon
- Rhythmicon—created with my original text from the drum machine entry, boosted virtually verbatim
- string piano
[edit] Other articles and items substantially expanded and revised
Articles
|
Categories, lists, and templates
|
[edit] Additional articles contributed to with more than minor edits
[edit] Useful things
A perfectly stated reminder:
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Iamunknown 02:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Awarded for for having a great sense of humor.
Frank van Mierlo 03:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
Wow, amazing work on midnight movies. I'm a huge film geek and am super glad to see such a good article come out of the crap that used to be midnight movies.Andman8 20:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
The Barnstar of High Culture |
I, Ceoil, don't normally go in for this kind of thing, but this in recognition of insightful, comprehensive, and overall excellent work in restoring Punk Rock to Featured Article status status. + Ceoil 00:43, 20 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The Purple Heart |
I, Jeffpw, award this barnstar to DCGeist for enduring the tortures of Prometheus (lasting seemingly longer than the Punic Wars) while attempting to appease the dreaded FAR committee. Jeffpw 23:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
Mini-Purple Heart |
What he said. (Subject to retraction if by some off-chance your wiki-karma has attracted all that crap [by which I am not referring to that portion of the FAR commentary deemed constructive by a hypothetical consensus of users—as typified by Marskell. There, I've covered all my bases.]) –Outriggr § 04:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)) |