Talk:DBc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

This article should be titled "dBc", not "DBc" Greg 14:25, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Arguments against proposed merger

  • I found the article on dBm to be very useful, with some extension the dBc article could be equally useful.
  • I would say there is a clear distinction between the unit dBc and the phenomenon of phase noise.
  • Given the lack of information in the phase noise article, I would say there isn't even short-term benefit to the merger.DJIndica 22:13, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I see no point in merging this into phase noise. dBc is not only used when talking about phase noise. It's a generic unit. Romanski 11:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../d/b/c/Talk%7EDBc_9780.html"