Talk:Dayuan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Dayuan is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 22, 2005.
Article Milestones Date Process Result April 9, 2005 Featured article candidate Promoted Current Status: Featured article

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects Click [show] for further details
This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the quality scale. (add comments) More information about this article... Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload. FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the Project's quality scale. High This article has been rated as high-importance on the Project's importance scale. This article needs the Ethnic group Infobox to be added and/or populated. After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses. WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks: Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic Groups tasks: Meta-tasks: Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project. Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution: Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention Iyer Peruvian people Start an article: Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

This article was the selected article of the China Portal in September 2006.

This article has been selected for Version 0.5 and the next release version of Wikipedia. This Socsci article has been rated FA-Class on the assessment scale.

Contents 1 Name 2 Requests for clarification 3 What language did they speak? 4 Indo-European 5 Better than me 6 Wine 7 Request for a reference about the possibility that Yuan <Yona

[edit] Name

There are some controversy in names:

• In most sources I was able to find in the internet, it's 大宛, not 大苑 (e.g. [1]).Also it's unclear from the article, does 宛 look the same in both Simplified Chinese and Traditional Chinese
• the spelling also varies in different sources: Ta-Yuan or Dawan or even Dayuan and not Dawan [2].

Could somebody clarify these issues? Also I think, that tones should be included for the name, e.g., in hanyu pinyin-style. Cmapm 13:18, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Good catch. I replaced the ideograms. For the tones, somebody in the know will have to do it. PHG 12:50, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Requests for clarification

I noticed this article because it just became a featured article, but I missed it while it was a candidate. I would have made these requests then had I seen it. I know nothing about the topic, so I think I can bring a valuable fresh set of eyes to the article. Specifically the intro is very hard to understand if you don't already know the subject. The biggest problem is the sentence structure in the first paragraph and the fact that I can't find anywhere in the lead or the article that states how long these people were independent or what successors if any they had. If there is simply no information on that that can be noted too. Not mentioning how long the people lasted as a group seems like a major oversight. As to the lead section here is how it reads to me:

The Ta-Yuan (distracting but important details I can skip, no big deal) were a people of Ferghana (What is this? a place, ethnic group, etc?) in Central Asia, described in the ..., following the travels of Zhang Qian in 130 BCE, and the numerous embassies that followed him into Central Asia thereafter.

The sentence structure starting "following the travels..." makes it really hard to tell what is going on. They are a people in Central Asia following the travels of Zhang Qian? Did they exist before 130BCE? After? Are there any sources about them besides the Chinese? There are a lot of great things in the article so don't get me wrong. The above issues just make it hard for a novice to access. - Taxman 20:26, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

Personally, I find the notation of Ta-Yuan (English?) and Da Wan (han yu pin yin) very confusing. It's similar to the notation for Yun Tun (han yu pin yin) and Wanton (English: similar to chinese dumplings). Perhaps someone who is well read into this area of knowledge comment about the phrase "...suggested that...“Yuan” was simply a transliteration of the words “Yona”, or “Yavana”, used throughout antiquity in Asia to designate Greeks (“Ionians”), so that Ta-Yuan (lit. “Great Yuan”) would mean "Great Ionians"." This is because in Chinese, Da literally means big and it may be infered to be some what similar to great. Similarily, the wikipedia article about Tofu (Doufu) may also be refered by some as TouFu (Wade-Giles); as to Ta Yuan, Da Yuan, Da Wan. I'm confusing right? --Glisteringwaters 17:18, Nov 22, 2005

Ta Yuan does not seem to be pinyin. Given that this is not exactly a common word in English (unlike Tofu or Taoism), wouldn't it sit better with conventions to move to Da Yuan, or Da Wan, whatever is the correct pronunciation? --Sumple (Talk) 07:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What language did they speak?

Great article! But reading it I became curious about what language the people spoke. I guess it could have been Ancient Greek or some such, but maybe not. If the Ta-Yan language is known, I think the article should mention what it was. And if it isn't known, state so. Shanes 01:30, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

They (or at least their rulers) probably would have spoken a variation of Macedonian, although especially given their Buddhism I'm guessing that whatever language that was would have had a lot of absorption. Kuralyov 06:25, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

As Macedonians (a greek tribe - φύλο ), Greek would have been their native language. It was also the language of all other hellenistic kingdomsof the time so I wouldn't expect an exception here (notice the inscription on the coin picture also). Note however that the particular kind of Greek spoken is unlikely to have been the ancient Macedonian dialect (except perhaps for informal purposes). Especially among officials and for all official purposes it was generally Attic Greek which was favored. This practice eventually gave rise elsewhere to the formation of the Hellenistic Koine, the predecessor of Modern Greek.

[edit] Indo-European

I am disturbed by the text "urbanized dwellers with Indo-European features" in the article.

"Indo-European" is a linguistic term, and is confusing and inappropriate in referring to people. Did they appear European, Indian, or something else?

The Wikipedia article on Indo-European notes that the term has been extended to cultures and religions, but does not (I'm glad to say) suggest an ethnic application.

"Proto Indo-European" could reasonably be used to designate a people, but is not relevant here by several millennia.

I recommend that the word be changed to either 'Caucasian', or if that term is felt to be dubious, 'European'.

I totally agree. "Indo-European features" seems to imply that the French and Spanish have those features but the Basques don't, which would be nonsense. I would change it myself, but I don't know what it's supposed to mean exactly. Features like Indians and Europeans? —JerryFriedman 16:49, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Better than me

Thanks to whoever reversed the changes from the porn prank. I didn't know how to do it and was in the middle of trying to just remove the picture Liastnir 14:56, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wine

The article states that wine was introduced by the TaYuan after Zhang Qian's visit (in the Han dynasty). But wine has been in China since at least the Shang dynasty (and as far back as the early neolithic, if the recent analysis of those Jiahu vessels is correct). I propose deletion of the statement until a clarification is given. UPDATE: I have commented out that bit so it can be viewed in edit mode. It's in the "Caucasian traits" section.

--SohanDsouza 23:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I mentionned both views in the text. PHG 00:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Wait a sec. Firstly, it is historical fact, not a research topic, that wine has been in China since the Shang and a while before as well [3][4]. The idea that the neolithics of Jiahu had wine is a more recent contention [5].

Does the Shiji state that the grape or grape wine was brought to China, or that any kind of wine was brought to China? Wine can be made from materials other than grapes, you know. The quote you provided would seem to indicate that it was grapes or grape wine, not wine. That was the clarification I sought.

UPDATE: I have reorganized that area. The Shiji clearly states that grapes and alfalfa were the transmissions, not wine. Other sources corroborate that grapes were just introduced at the time.

This article requires major cleanup. YueZhi is sometimes spelt Yueh-Chih, sometimes Yuezhi, sometimes Yue-Chi. This is just one of the inconsistencies in the artice. --SohanDsouza 00:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for a reference about the possibility that Yuan <Yona

I have often wondered about the statement in the article that: "It has also been suggested that the name “Yuan” was simply a transliteration of the words “Yona”, or “Yavana”, used throughout antiquity in Asia to designate Greeks (“Ionians”), so that Dayuan (lit. “Great Yuan”) would mean "Great Ionians"."

Can anyone please give me a reference for this statement? Many thanks, John Hill 03:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi John. I answered a while ago on your talk page. It is still there. The issue was apparently debated by Willie p28 ("Notes on the Western regions", and de Groot p64 ("Chinesische Urkunden zur Geschichte Asiens"), quoted by Tarn. Best regards. PHG 12:42, 20 August 2006 (UTC)