Talk:Daybreak Community

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Daybreak Community article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Planning Portal This article covers subjects of relevance to WikiProject Urban studies and planning, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the WikiProject: Urban studies and planning, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. You may also be interested in contributing to the Portal:Planning
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] Spamming

One of the most consistetly spammed entries. They keep trying to have the storesonline.com address added (via an IP and now 2 accounts) and the sheer persistence suggests to me the best policy is to get the link blocked if possible. other tan that vigilance seems to be the key. (Emperor 04:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC))

Just thought I'd keep a track of the various accounts spamming the same links in the same ways:

• User talk:151.118.128.232
• User talk:Coresubprime
• User talk:Daybreakutahhomeforsale
• User talk:Yellowpens
• User talk:Losgatosmiami
• User talk:Perpetualmachine

Probably not the last either. (Emperor 13:55, 17 January 2007 (UTC))

Updated list (Emperor 17:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC))

I've asked for someone to look into this as it is getting silly. [1] (Emperor 04:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC))

Added another account. (Emperor 05:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC))

You should tag them with sockie headers and cite the edits. That'll clear things up! - Alison^✍ 05:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

I've requested a check [2] and that should clear things up and hopefully sort them out once and for all ;) (Emperor 05:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC))

They've all been revealed as socks and labelled as such. The underlying IP has been blocked for a month so note that on your calendar. There are also suggestions about blocking account creation by them and blacklisting the links, all of which should make it difficult for them to pull the same stunt in the future. (Emperor 14:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC))