User talk:Daveyboy16
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article David Horner may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 15:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dave horner
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please read WP:BIO, WP:AUTO & WP:VANITY regarding the creation of autobiographical articles. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- in the banner to respond.
For a quick overview of Wikipedia's policies, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. You can still create other articles about encyclopedic subjects. If you can't think of a subject, you can check the recent requests or improve an existing article.
-- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 19:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- If you feel you can present a case well enough, use WP:Deletion Review to appeal the speedy deletion. However, as far as I can see you have very little grounds to do this on. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 19:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:735643200 l.jpg listed for deletion
A tag has been placed on Matthew Marshall, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Turlo Lomon 11:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)