Talk:David Ritz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
== Sexual Healing publishing rights == To say this matter is controversial is to state the obvious. Am I alone in feeling this must be sourced to clarify the matter? To cite Ritz will obviously be non-objective so please don't point to "Divided Soul" as it will only heighten the controversy. Mr. Ritz is felt by some to have insinuated himself into various circumstances and it will serve all to clarify this matter. (I'm stating this objectively, I honestly don't have a proper opinion on the matter).--Tednor 02:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
If Mr. Ritz original source material backs up his assertions, then please point specifically to the cited resource and not the text of the biography itself. Again, I admire Mr. Ritz for his many contributions to Soul Music culture in general and I'd like to know how this matter is resolved. Thanks to those who provide sources, as it is important work that most of us (me guilty!) tend to overlook.--Tednor 02:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)