Talk:David Berkowitz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Criminal Biography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide on true crime and criminology-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article is on a subject of mid-importance for Crime-related articles.
WikiProject Criminal Biography To-do:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Portal:Biography
 Biography Portal
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
 
Portal:Religion
 Religion Portal
This article is supported by WikiProject Religion. This project provides a central approach to Religion-related subjects on wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
B This article has been rated as B on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article falls within the scope of the Left Hand Path work group. If you are interested in Left Hand Path-related topics, please visit the project page to see how you can help.
WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia The spoken word version of this article is part of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, an attempt to produce recordings of Wikipedia articles. To participate, visit the project page.

Contents

[edit] Question...

Should Berkowitz be removed from the "Jewish Americans" category because of his rejection of Judaism and his claim to be a born-again Christian?

No, he doesn't practice Judaism, but one doesn't lose their Jewishness. It's more than religion. 66.75.8.138 09:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
But if you are argueing he was Jewish by birth, that's wrong too. He was adopted. And he never strongly accepted Judaism. Before and after his killings, he toyed with christianity. And he was never strongly "Jewish" in a religious sense. HomsarII 00:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Ignore above. It turns out his birth mother was Jewish too, and the mother's religion is controlling. HomsarII 00:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

The first external link says he killed Donna Lauria on July 29, 1976, not Jody Valentini. Can anybody shed any light on this? Betelgeuse 18:59, 8 May 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Radio Interview Information

In a radio interview David claims that pornography addiction was a contributing factor to his actions. It's probably not a popular fact, but I think it would be an insightful addition to the article if someone can find some written information about it. — SimonEast 05:40, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)


In a radio interview Berkowitz said that his real parents were of Jewish heritage. Where does this Falco name fit in? FrancisDrake 16:10, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

His birth father Tony falco was an Italian American Catholic. Ony his mother was Jewish and her parents strongly objected to the marriage. Berkowitz was a paranoid shizophrenic which may have compounded his resentment at being adopted. Medication for this disorder was inadequate in the 1970's and his adoptive parents may not have aware of his problem or have sought help for him.Dakota 22:17, September 2, 2005 (UTC)


Are these radio interviews linked in the "External links" sections? They'd be valuable resources. Thanks, -Willmcw 18:13, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Really?

365 years?

I believe he got 6 consecutive life sentences or something. 365 years is estimating somebody lives until they are 60 with 6 sentences. He probably should be getting about 480 years.

I have no idea how consecutive life sentences are worked out and the article doesn't explain that well although it'll be best to ask there. However your sums seem a bit off. The life expentancy at birth, in the US, for both sexes and all races in 1980 was ~74 years, not 80... Nil Einne

The BBC article says 365 years. Lewiscode 19:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

A life sentence is 100 years so he would be in jail for 600years 365 or 480 years and that is stat from crimnal justice class i took in High School because they can give someone 99 years.74.133.247.221 02:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Savannah

[edit] Citation for Supreme Court Cases?

The article mentions that several Supreme Court cases found laws similiar to New York's Son of Sam laws were unconstitional. I was hoping there would be a cite in the source section for this statement.

[edit] Son of sam law unconstitutional???

This is clearly misleading. The "Son of Sam" laws are still in effect in New York though probably not in the form alluded to. Further, a number of states have their own versions. Really, what needs to be done is to explain is what the Son of Sam laws do and what was struck down.

The statement is extremely funny as I am in the process of writing a convict a letter from the office of my firm explaining how this law works. Hence, if I am writing the letter, and the statute is popularly entitled "Son of Sam," and I'm discussing the operation of the valid law, the son of sam statute cannot be unconstitutional.

Falacious reasoning? Everything's metaphysical I suppose. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.179.107.240 (talk • contribs) .

I guess the liberties need to be taken to clarify and the Son of Sam laws should have their own article, no? 69.17.59.230 23:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree. In any case, I would assume that anon, who sounds like a lawyer can explain the history and background behind these laws well and what did happen in 1991 so hopefuly he or she could help write the article. Nil Einne 18:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

The Son of Sam law is absolutely unconstitutional. 502 U.S. 105; 112 S. Ct. 501; 116 L. Ed. 2d 476; 1991 U.S. LEXIS 7172; 60 U.S.L.W. 4029; 19 Media L. Rep. 1609. Those are the parallel citations.

[edit] Blame / More Detail

"Berkowitz also claims to not be the Son Of Sam shooter, but merely one of the many look out men. In his claims he puts the blame on John "Wheaties" Carr as one of the shooters, as well as Carr's brother, Micheal Carr, whom he claimed to be the shooter in the Queens disco shooting."

I do not believe he is attempting to put the blame elsewhere when he makes these claims. He also never said he was just a look out men, that he never shot anyone, which is what this article is saying. Berkowitz has said that he was the gunmen on several of the murders, he has said specifically which ones, but that for some he was only a look out man. There are many who believe Berkowitz did not act alone, you can give more credit to this theory. I think this section of the article should be cleaned up and more details of Berkowitz's crimes can be given.


I agree. According to Berkowitz's own website, he DOES NOT DENY that he committed the murders. Over and over again, in multiple places, he takes full blame for the lives lost. In fact, on the front page, he even calls himself a serial killer. These portions of the article need to be cleaned up, as Berkowitz currently does NOT put the blame on anyone else for his crimes. --70.125.41.24 22:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Inconsistancy

The text says both that he claimed that Carr was a demon, and that his lab was a demon. 198.82.59.174 20:24, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Confusing

I am not familiar with details of Berkowitz' crimes, nor his arrest, nor trial. This article sheds almost no light on the subjects. No detailed account of his crimes is given at all, it is unclear how he was arrested. Look at articles about other famous serial killers for good examples. This one clearly needs to be expanded. - idiotoff 06:41, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Letter information missing

The first letter is suddenly quoted without any introduction. When was it sent? To whom? etc 163.192.21.44 22:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Seinfeld

There is no episode of Seinfeld called "the Van." This is either a bad reference or bad information. Does the poster know where it is from?

[edit] Get rid of trivial links

Somebody get rid of all the useless links. I got rid of some of them, but I'm too lazy to get rid of the rest

[edit] Accuracy Disputed

David Berkowitz was tried and convicted of multiple murders. Full stop. Lopping the "MSNC" report in the beginning of this article suggests that the man was wrongly convicted. This is flat out wrong. Unless New York State officially reopens this case (which I have never ever heard of them even considering) then the facts stand. Conspiracy theories abound everywhere and I do not think they should be given equal time merely because they present an "entertaining" sidebar. Unless someone can produce hard evidence that Berkowitz was wrongly accused or convicted then the MSNC part should be removed from the begnning and placed somewhere else in the article. Remember, Berkowitz was tried and convicted. End of story.

I don't think that section implies that he was wrongly convicted at all. It doesn't read that way to me. Instead, I read it as saying that some law enforcement people feel that Berkowitz may not have been the sole person responsible for the murders. Basically, they don't question whether he was a mass murderer, they have questions about whether another murderer may still be out there. - Flooey 21:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
This case has not been re-opened. What these detectives are saying now is pure speculation, not fact. How can it belong in a Wikipedia article?


[edit] References in popular culture

  • I'm going to attempt to sort these chronologicaly. Only some don't have any date attatched to them, and still others have very few details at all. I am also trying to trim some of the superfluous information about each entry (I.E. things that would fit better in an arcticle about the item in question). Any help would be appreciated.Lewiscode 20:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I've cleaned it up and will now try to clean up the rest of the article (A weird way of going about things I know, but I wanted to add a reference and found it in need of cleaning up). Lewiscode 23:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Misinformation About The Letter?

According to Crime Library, the Son of Sam letter was addressed to Captain Joseph Borrelli, not to Chief of Detectives John Keenan. There are also discrepancies in the way some of the words are spelled, etc. I am changing this until the information concerning the previous version can be verified. --MosheA 20:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../d/a/v/Talk%7EDavid_Berkowitz_bc4e.html"