Talk:David Allen Hulse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

I think David Allen Hulse is an important current author of occultism, published by Llewellyn in their sourcebooks on magic series. In fact, of that series, I beleive it to be the best (tho not the most classic, which would be another MUCH older book from the rennaisance or late middle ages, or some such [can't remember author or title currently].) Really: check it out. Books got more tables of correspondences than Aleister Crowley's Liber 777, for chrissake and they are much better presented. I've seen much greater obscura make it on here with no where near so fine toothed a comb! Who wanted me deleted, anyway?!Thaddeus Slamp 00:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Hulses Key of it All is listed as a reference or source by @ least one wikipedia article by an author of whom I know nothing @ all. They just did not hyperlink it.Thaddeus Slamp 00:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_correspondences" Category: Magic

[edit] secrets, helpers, editors

has my secret helper fixed the problems so vigelantly cited by my secret editor? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thaddeus Slamp (talk • contribs) 18:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC).Thaddeus Slamp 18:36, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't understand your references to secret editors, as all edits should be attributed in the contributions history, but if you are referring to the notability template currently placed on the article, I would suggest you review the guideline linked to for information on resolving the concerns. Dancter 19:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm still new. Figured out right after writing that that 1 can find out who did what by looking @ page history, which lists who did what when.Thaddeus Slamp 05:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] cin I have my article, cin I haw haw?

The person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field. Painters, sculptors, architects, engineers, and other professionals whose work is widely recognized (for better or worse) and who are likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field. Published authors, editors and photographers who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work.

I still don't know whether this article is now considered good enough to pass muster, but hopefully it does and also meets the above guidelines.