Talk:Dave Eggers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the San Francisco Bay Area WikiProject, a collaborative effort to build a more detailed guide on Wikipedia's coverage of San Francisco and the Bay Area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Should add info about his monthly article for Spin and his serialized novel for Salon.com. I believe Eggers worked at Salon before AHWOSG was published. --Brooks 05:29, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Wasn't he nominated for a Pulitzer but didn't win?

===>Yes. For A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius. This says so. And the Internet is never wrong. Justin (koavf) July 2, 2005 05:07 (UTC)

I believe he was born in March and not January. Someone should double check that.

[edit] Sister's suicide

Did that really happen? It looks suspicious to me, like stealth vandalism. Babajobu 22:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

-Agreed, I've removed it for now. --Oldy 22:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

-It did happen, and I've cited a reputable source. Please keep it in. Pagana 13:45, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Here's a quote from Eggars himself about it, http://www.mcsweeneys.net/links/interview/readers_de.html: "A lot of people, total strangers, wrote extremely kind notes after my sister died last year, and that meant a lot to us. It was such a hard year. There are times when my brothers and I just look around and can't believe there's only three of us left."

I removed it. Is there a source for it? It needs a reliable inline source, and it shouldn't refer to "reports", it should refer to her suicide. Please re-add it if verification is found. Twinxor t 07:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fiction or non-?

In one section of the article his first book "Heartbreaking" is listed as a memoir with fictional elements; in another section it's listed as a nonfiction book. Which is correct?

Both. Seriously. Memoirs are generally regarded as non-fiction, but memoir, as a genre, is distinct from autobiography. The latter is, or is presumed to be, purely factual. In a memoir, however, the writer nearly always makes use of some poetic license in describing events--changing timelines, dialogue, etc. etc. The result is accurately described by the title of the appendix Eggers added to the paperback version of AHWOSG: "Mistakes We Knew We Were Making".--ShelfSkewed 05:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What is the What?

If you are going to list Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius as nonfiction, then you have to also list What is the What as nonfiction. It's a biography of the man. Although there may also be "fictional" aspects of it, I believe it should be listed as non-fiction. I gazed at Valentino Achak Deng with my own two eyes. He's a real person and this is his story. I know that semantically, this would be considered fiction since it's a novel but I seem to remember a little man named Truman Capote defining the art of the non-fiction novel. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sclemmo2 (talk • contribs) 02:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC).

You might find the first few paragraphs of this article interesting: "Different worlds: The many lives -- novelist, social activist, literary innovator, teacher -- of Dave Eggers" by Susan Larson from The Times-Picayune [New Orleans], February 06, 2007. In the article, Eggers discusses the impossibility of crafting a believable factual narrative with so few provable details to work with—"[Deng's] memory had so many holes in it"—and how he felt "liberated" when he allowed himself to treat the story as a novel.

By contrast, Capote, in writing In Cold Blood, had access to all the things Eggers did not—facts, dates, details—and so could (and of necessity had to) hew closely to them. Capote may have called his book a novel, but it isn't. What it is is a superbly well written true-crime book --ShelfSkewed [Talk] 03:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC)